Compile to Compress: Boosting Formal Theorem Provers by Compiler Outputs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in formal theorem proving, yet state-of-the-art performance often necessitates prohibitive test-time compute via massive roll-outs or extended context windows. In this work, we address this scalability bottleneck by exploiting an informative structure in formal verification: the observation that compilers map a vast space of diverse proof attempts to a compact set of structured failure modes. We introduce a learning-to-refine framework that leverages this compression to perform efficient learning and proof exploration. We perform tree search that corrects errors locally conditioned on explicit verifier feedback, thereby circumventing the costs associated with accumulating a long history of proof attempts. Extensive evaluations show that our method consistently amplifies the reasoning capabilities of base provers across varying scales. Notably, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on PutnamBench among publicly reported ~8B and ~32B parameter models under comparable test-time budgets, offering a scalable paradigm for next-generation verifier-guided reasoning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Ax-Prover: A Deep Reasoning Agentic Framework for Theorem Proving in Mathematics and Quantum Physics14 Oct
- 2025Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal Reasoning26 Sep
- 2025Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Proving31 Jul
- 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decomposition30 Apr
- 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning15 Apr
- 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search15 Aug
- 2024TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Experts3 Jul
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models5 Feb
Other references · 10
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 427
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
- 2024DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Datacited by 234
- 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 192
- 2025Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Provingcited by 133
- 2021Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Modelscited by 132
- 2018Reinforcement Learning of Theorem Provingcited by 69
- 2026A Minimal Agent for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 18
- 2025Kimina Lean Server: A High-Performance Lean Server for Large-Scale Verificationcited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correction
- 2025ProofCompass: Enhancing Specialized Provers with LLM Guidance
- 2025Spark-Prover-X1: Formal Theorem Proving Through Diverse Data Training
- 2025LLM-based Automated Theorem Proving Hinges on Scalable Synthetic Data Generation
- 2026A Learning Method for Symbolic Systems Using Large Language Models ↗
- 2026Direct Optimization of Generators for Search in Automated Theorem Proving
- 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Proving
- 2026Goedel-Code-Prover: Hierarchical Proof Search for Open State-of-the-Art Code Verification