mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Friction-Augmented Drifting Models for Resource-Efficient Domain Translation

arXiv 2604.18194 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Single-step generators promise high-fidelity synthesis at a fraction of the inference and training cost of ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based flow models, a central concern when compute is limited. Drifting Models (DMs) train a one-step generator by evolving samples under a kernel-based drift field, avoiding ODE integration entirely, but a two-particle surrogate of their iteration admits a locally repulsive regime in which repulsion can dominate the attraction to the target. We introduce DMF (Drifting Model with Friction), which scales the drift field by a linearly-scheduled coefficient 1-γ(i). A closed-form analysis of the surrogate gives a per-step contraction threshold and a finite-horizon bound on the error trajectory, suggesting why friction can halt the iteration before it relaxes to a spurious force-balance fixed point. On FFHQ latent-space domain translation, DMF significantly improves on the frictionless DM it extends in both Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID; paired p=0.019, Cohen's d=1.71) and CLIP-MMD (CMMD; p=0.005, d=2.55) with no additional forward passes or parameters, and on a 2D task it sharply improves DM's Fr'echet (moment-matching) error while remaining on par under the 2-Wasserstein distance. DMF also achieves FID and CMMD comparable to the far more expensive Optimal Flow Matching (OFM) in our runs, at roughly 29× lower training wall-clock on identical hardware. DMF thus delivers these gains with a single scheduled scalar.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.

Builds on

15 of 19 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  2. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  3. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  4. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  5. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 964
  6. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 835
  7. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 407
  8. 2023Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generationcited by 303
  9. 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 202
  10. 2020Adversarial Latent Autoencoderscited by 155
  11. 2022Neural Optimal Transportcited by 123
  12. 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 98
3 more
  1. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 95
  2. 2024Optimal Flow Matching: Learning Straight Trajectories in Just One Stepcited by 74
  3. 2026Sinkhorn-Drifting Generative Modelscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Bias-Constrained Diffusion Schedules for PDE Emulations: Reconstruction Error Minimization and Efficient Unrolled Training
  2. 2025Physics-Constrained Flow Matching: Sampling Generative Models with Hard Constraints
  3. 2026Mitigating the Contractivity Trap in Diffusion ODEs via Stein Stabilization
  4. 2025Towards Reasoning for PDE Foundation Models: A Reward-Model-Driven Inference-Time-Scaling Algorithm
  5. 2026Stabilizing Physics-Informed Consistency Models via Structure-Preserving Training
  6. 2026Source Anchoring for Physical Consistency in Flow Matching Models
  7. 2025A-FloPS: Accelerating Diffusion Models via Adaptive Flow Path Sampler
  8. 2026Commit Locally, Exit Globally: Coordinating Adaptive Sampling and Early Exit in Diffusion Language Models