mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Autonomous Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Enhanced Search and Rescue of Drowning Swimmers: Image-Based Localization and Mission Simulation

arXiv 2604.18088 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.AI stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Drowning is an omnipresent risk associated with any activity on or in the water, and rescuing a drowning person is particularly challenging because of the time pressure, making a short response time important. Further complicating water rescue are unsupervised and extensive swimming areas, precise localization of the target, and the transport of rescue personnel. Technical innovations can provide a remedy: We propose an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS), also known as a drone-in-a-box system, consisting of a fleet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) allocated to purpose-built hangars near swimming areas. In an emergency, the UAS can be deployed in addition to Standard Rescue Operation (SRO) equipment to locate the distressed person early by performing a fully automated Search and Rescue (S&R) operation and dropping a flotation device. In this paper, we address automatically locating distressed swimmers using the image-based object detection architecture You Only Look Once (YOLO). We present a dataset created for this application and outline the training process. We evaluate the performance of YOLO versions 3, 5, and 8 and architecture sizes (nano, extra-large) using Mean Average Precision (mAP) metrics [email protected] and [email protected]:.95. Furthermore, we present two Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) approaches to simulate response times of SRO and UAS-based water rescue. This enables estimation of time savings relative to SRO when selecting the UAS configuration (type, number, and location of UAVs and hangars). Computational experiments for a test area in the Lusatian Lake District, Germany, show that UAS assistance shortens response time. Even a small UAS with two hangars, each containing one UAV, reduces response time by a factor of five compared to SRO.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.

Builds on

19 of 77 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  4. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  5. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  6. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  7. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  8. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  9. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  10. 2018Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentationcited by 796
  11. 2019CSPNet: A New Backbone that can Enhance Learning Capability of CNNcited by 381
  12. 2020Detection and Tracking Meet Drones Challengecited by 261
7 more
  1. 2016Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognitioncited by 184
  2. 2023A Comprehensive Review of YOLO Architectures in Computer Vision: From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAScited by 149
  3. 2021SeaDronesSee: A Maritime Benchmark for Detecting Humans in Open Watercited by 59
  4. 2025The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it meanscited by 30
  5. 2023WiSARD: A Labeled Visual and Thermal Image Dataset for Wilderness Search and Rescuecited by 9
  6. 2023YOLO-based Object Detection in Industry 4.0 Fischertechnik Model Environmentcited by 2
  7. 2025Object detection characteristics in a learning factory environment using YOLOv8cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.