mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

COSAC: Counterfactual Credit Assignment in Sequential Cooperative Teams

arXiv 2604.17693 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.MAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In cooperative teams where agents act in a fixed order and share a single team-level reward (multi-agent language systems, sequential robotic tasks), per-agent credit assignment is under-determined. Critic-based approaches scale poorly as the number of agents grows owing to the costly maintenance of joint/factored critic(s), whereas the existing critic-free alternatives have other issues: common credit across agents that couples every agent's signal to teammate noise, importance-sampling corrections for upstream-update staleness that incur variance exponential in team size, or per-agent counterfactual replay that isolates each agent's effect at the price of extra environment or reward calls. We propose COSAC, a critic-free per-agent policy gradient for sequential cooperative teams. COSAC fits an additive per-agent decomposition of the team reward by a single ridge regression on the rollout batch (giving each agent a learning signal decoupled from teammate noise), and computes each agent's counterfactual advantage from fictitious continuations of the current policy (policy forward passes that replace both importance-sampling reweighting and per-agent environment replay, at no extra environment or reward cost). The estimator instantiates the Sequential Aristocrat Utility (SeqAU), our extension of Wolpert and Tumer's (2001) aristocrat utility to sequential teams. We prove bias and variance bounds on SeqAU credits that stay controlled as the team grows. Our controlled study on sequential bandits demonstrates that COSAC attains the lowest advantage MSE and consistently low learning regret across team sizes up to K = 16. On the AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) task, where four Qwen3-0.6B agents reason in turn about a grade-school science question, COSAC attains faster convergence than the other critic-free baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  4. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  5. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  6. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  7. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  8. 2020FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradientscited by 178
  9. 2024LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges and Open Problemscited by 119
  10. 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
  11. 2020Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy Gradientscited by 97
  12. 2026Hindsight Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon LLM Agentscited by 51
6 more
  1. 2021Settling the Variance of Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 45
  2. 2025Unlocking the Power of Multi-Agent LLM for Reasoning: From Lazy Agents to Deliberationcited by 11
  3. 2026Counterfactual Credit Policy Optimization for Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 10
  4. 2020Difference Rewards Policy Gradientscited by 8
  5. 2024Counterfactual Effect Decomposition in Multi-Agent Sequential Decision Makingcited by 4
  6. 2025Sequential Multi-Agent Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.