PAC-Bayes Bounds for Gibbs Posteriors via Singular Learning Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We derive explicit non-asymptotic PAC-Bayes generalization bounds for Gibbs posteriors, that is, data-dependent distributions over model parameters obtained by exponentially tilting a prior with the empirical risk. Unlike classical worst-case complexity bounds based on uniform laws of large numbers, which require explicit control of the model space in terms of metric entropy (integrals), our analysis yields posterior-averaged risk bounds that can be applied to overparameterized models and adapt to the data structure and the intrinsic model complexity. The bound involves a marginal-type integral over the parameter space, which we analyze using tools from singular learning theory to obtain explicit and practically meaningful characterizations of the posterior risk. Applications to low-rank matrix completion and ReLU neural network regression and classification show that the resulting bounds are analytically tractable and substantially tighter than classical complexity-based bounds. Our results highlight the potential of PAC-Bayes analysis for precise finite-sample generalization guarantees in modern overparameterized and singular models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2026.
Builds on
28 of 53 references.
References · 28
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
- 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 304
- 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
- 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 234
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
- 2013A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributionscited by 172
- 2017A Bayesian Perspective on Generalization and Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 134
16 more
- 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
- 2018Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: A PAC-Bayesian Compression Approachcited by 125
- 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 75
- 2017Concentration of tempered posteriors and of their variational approximationscited by 66
- 2020PAC-Bayes Analysis Beyond the Usual Boundscited by 63
- 2023Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds for Large Language Modelscited by 53
- 2015Learning with Square Loss: Localization through Offset Rademacher Complexitycited by 37
- 2013A Bayesian information criterion for singular modelscited by 22
- 2022On Rademacher Complexity-based Generalization Bounds for Deep Learningcited by 16
- 2023Classification with Deep Neural Networks and Logistic Losscited by 16
- 2020When does gradient descent with logistic loss find interpolating two-layer networks?cited by 12
- 2013Bayesian methods for low-rank matrix estimation: short survey and theoretical studycited by 7
- 2021Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Low-Rank Matrix Completioncited by 7
- 2020Gibbs posterior concentration rates under sub-exponential type lossescited by 5
- 2023Bayesian Free Energy of Deep ReLU Neural Network in Overparametrized Casescited by 5
- 2020Gibbs posterior inference on multivariate quantilescited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.