SeekerGym: A Benchmark for Reliable Information Seeking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite their substantial successes, AI agents continue to face fundamental challenges in terms of trustworthiness. Consider deep research agents, tasked with searching for information relevant to a given topic-while AI agents can perform effective information retrieval, there is little guarantee regarding the completeness of this information. Gaps in retrieved information can leave biases that mislead users even if the information they are given is correct and relevant. We introduce SeekerGym, a benchmark designed to evaluate the completeness of information retrieved by AI agents. In addition, SeekerGym also measures how well agents quantify their uncertainty in the completeness of their information; if an agent fails to retrieve all relevant information, it is useful for it to at least quantify how much might be missing. At a high level, each task in SeekerGym is a document (e.g., a Wikipedia article), and the AI agent must issue queries to retrieve passages from that document. Intuitively, the document comprehensively covers a topic, so the ability to retrieve its sections directly measures completeness of information retrieval. In addition to Wikipedia, we also consider machine learning survey papers, where the goal is to retrieve relevant sections of a survey paper. We benchmark several models and algorithms; the best approaches retrieve 42.5% of passages on Wikipedia and 29.2% on ML Surveys, leaving substantial room for improvement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
- 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 647
- 2023Conformal Language Modelingcited by 170
- 2023Conformal Prediction with Large Language Models for Multi-Choice Question Answeringcited by 139
- 2023LLM-Grounder: Open-Vocabulary 3D Visual Grounding with Large Language Model as an Agentcited by 135
- 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agentscited by 50
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025DeepWideSearch: Benchmarking Depth and Width in Agentic Information Seeking
- 2025WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-Seeking
- 2025From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents
- 2025InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025InfoMosaic-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Source Information Seeking in Tool-Augmented Agents
- 2026DailyReport: An Open-ended Benchmark for Evaluating Search Agents on Daily Search Tasks
- 2025Do LLM Agents Know How to Ground, Recover, and Assess? A Benchmark for Epistemic Competence in Information-Seeking Agents
- 2025Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge