mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Introspection Adapters: Training LLMs to Report Their Learned Behaviors

arXiv 2604.16812 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When model developers or users fine-tune an LLM, this can induce behaviors that are unexpected, deliberately harmful, or hard to detect. It would be far easier to audit LLMs if they could simply describe their behaviors in natural language. Here, we study a scalable approach to rapidly identify learned behaviors of many LLMs derived from a shared base LLM. Given a model M, our method works by finetuning models Mi from M with implanted behaviors bi; the (Mi, bi) pairs serve as labeled training data. We then train an introspection adapter (IA): a single LoRA adapter jointly trained across the finetunes Mi to cause them to verbalize their implanted behaviors. We find that this IA induces self-description of learned behaviors even in finetunes of M that were trained in very different ways from the Mi. For example, IAs generalize to AuditBench, achieving state-of-the-art at identifying explicitly hidden concerning behaviors. IAs can also be used to detect encrypted finetuning API attacks. They scale favorably with model size and training data diversity. Overall, our results suggest that IAs are a scalable, effective, and practically useful approach to auditing fine-tuned LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  4. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
  5. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
  6. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
  7. 2024Looking Inward: Language Models Can Learn About Themselves by Introspectioncited by 113
  8. 2025Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviorscited by 91
  9. 2025Auditing language models for hidden objectivescited by 83
  10. 2026Emergent Introspective Awareness in Large Language Modelscited by 82
  11. 2024Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptationcited by 80
  12. 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 52
7 more
  1. 2024LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Languagecited by 51
  2. 2026AuditBench: Evaluating Alignment Auditing Techniques on Models with Hidden Behaviorscited by 38
  3. 2025Narrow Finetuning Leaves Clearly Readable Traces in Activation Differencescited by 28
  4. 2025Self-Interpretability: LLMs Can Describe Complex Internal Processes that Drive Their Decisionscited by 25
  5. 2025Believe It or Not: How Deeply do LLMs Believe Implanted Facts?cited by 24
  6. 2025Towards Safeguarding LLM Fine-tuning APIs against Cipher Attackscited by 11
  7. 2025Learning to Interpret Weight Differences in Language Modelscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.