Fairness Constraints in High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most fairness-aware learning methods assume that sensitive attributes are observed, an assumption that may fail due to privacy, legal, or data-collection constraints. We develop a framework for fairness-aware generalized linear models when the sensitive attribute is latent, possibly multi-category, and the predictors may be high-dimensional. Candidate proxy variables are modeled using Gaussian mixtures for continuous predictors and product-multinomial mixtures for categorical predictors. The resulting posterior group-membership probabilities are used to residualize the predictors and reduce their association with the latent sensitive structure. For continuous outcomes, we use constrained least squares to limit the contribution of the estimated sensitive attribute to prediction variability. For binary outcomes, we use penalized logistic regression to reduce dependence between predicted probabilities and estimated group membership. In high-dimensional settings, the procedure is combined with SEMMS variable selection to obtain sparse models. We establish identifiability and latent-class recovery results for Gaussian and categorical mixtures and derive expressions that quantify the loss of predictive power after residualization.Simulations and real-data applications demonstrate favorable accuracy-fairness performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2021Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Featurescited by 45
- 2021Fairness without the sensitive attribute via Causal Variational Autoencodercited by 21
- 2021Pairwise Fairness for Ordinal Regressioncited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.