BAGEL: Benchmarking Animal Knowledge Expertise in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models have shown strong performance on broad-domain knowledge and reasoning benchmarks, but it remains unclear how well language models handle specialized animal-related knowledge under a unified closed-book evaluation protocol. We introduce BAGEL, a benchmark for evaluating animal knowledge expertise in language models. BAGEL is constructed from diverse scientific and reference sources, including bioRxiv, Global Biotic Interactions, Xeno-canto, and Wikipedia, using a combination of curated examples and automatically generated closed-book question-answer pairs. The benchmark covers multiple aspects of animal knowledge, including taxonomy, morphology, habitat, behavior, vocalization, geographic distribution, and species interactions. By focusing on closed-book evaluation, BAGEL measures animal-related knowledge of models without external retrieval at inference time. BAGEL further supports fine-grained analysis across source domains, taxonomic groups, and knowledge categories, enabling a more precise characterization of model strengths and systematic failure modes. Our benchmark provides a new testbed for studying domain-specific knowledge generalization in language models and for improving their reliability in biodiversity-related applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.
Builds on
29 of 42 references.
References · 29
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 675
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
17 more
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
- 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 249
- 2023BioCLIP: A Vision Foundation Model for the Tree of Lifecited by 159
- 2023K2: A Foundation Language Model for Geoscience Knowledge Understanding and Utilizationcited by 69
- 2025Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Abovecited by 51
- 2023OceanGPT: A Large Language Model for Ocean Science Taskscited by 42
- 2022BEANS: The Benchmark of Animal Soundscited by 37
- 2025Answer Matching Outperforms Multiple Choice for Language Model Evaluationcited by 37
- 2024NatureLM-audio: an Audio-Language Foundation Model for Bioacousticscited by 32
- 2024Distractor Generation in Multiple-Choice Tasks: A Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Evaluationcited by 25
- 2023Overview of BioASQ 2023: The eleventh BioASQ challenge on Large-Scale Biomedical Semantic Indexing and Question Answeringcited by 18
- 2024Plausibly Problematic Questions in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 13
- 2025SATA-BENCH: Select All That Apply Benchmark for Multiple Choice Questionscited by 9
- 2024ISPA: Inter-Species Phonetic Alphabet for Transcribing Animal Soundscited by 4
- 2026KNIGHT: Knowledge Graph-Driven Multiple-Choice Question Generation with Adaptive Hardness Calibrationcited by 4
- 2024EnviroExam: Benchmarking Environmental Science Knowledge of Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Environmental large language model Evaluation (ELLE) dataset: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generative AI applications in Eco-environment Domaincited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.