mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reversible Residual Normalization Alleviates Spatio-Temporal Distribution Shift

arXiv 2604.15838 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distribution shift severely degrades the performance of deep forecasting models. While this issue is well-studied for individual time series, it remains a significant challenge in the spatio-temporal domain. Effective solutions like instance normalization and its variants can mitigate temporal shifts by standardizing statistics. However, distribution shift on a graph is far more complex, involving not only the drift of individual node series but also heterogeneity across the spatial network where different nodes exhibit distinct statistical properties. To tackle this problem, we propose Reversible Residual Normalization (RRN), a novel framework that performs spatially-aware invertible transformations to address distribution shift in both spatial and temporal dimensions. Our approach integrates graph convolutional operations within invertible residual blocks, enabling adaptive normalization that respects the underlying graph structure while maintaining reversibility. By combining Center Normalization with spectral-constrained graph neural networks, our method captures and normalizes complex Spatio-Temporal relationships in a data-driven manner. The bidirectional nature of our framework allows models to learn in a normalized latent space and recover original distributional properties through inverse transformation, offering a robust and model-agnostic solution for forecasting on dynamic spatio-temporal systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  4. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  5. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  6. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
  7. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  8. 2019Graph WaveNet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modelingcited by 820
  9. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 636
  10. 2019GMAN: A Graph Multi-Attention Network for Traffic Predictioncited by 433
  11. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 364
  12. 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
12 more
  1. 2023Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Predictive Learning in Urban Computing: A Surveycited by 140
  2. 2023LargeST: A Benchmark Dataset for Large-Scale Traffic Forecastingcited by 116
  3. 2019Graph Normalizing Flowscited by 103
  4. 2023Dish-TS: A General Paradigm for Alleviating Distribution Shift in Time Series Forecastingcited by 91
  5. 2024Normalizing Flows are Capable Generative Modelscited by 89
  6. 2022AirFormer: Predicting Nationwide Air Quality in China with Transformerscited by 73
  7. 2023LipsFormer: Introducing Lipschitz Continuity to Vision Transformerscited by 33
  8. 2022SDWPF: A Dataset for Spatial Dynamic Wind Power Forecasting Challenge at KDD Cup 2022cited by 21
  9. 2022Automated Dilated Spatio-Temporal Synchronous Graph Modeling for Traffic Predictioncited by 15
  10. 2024Mitigating Oversmoothing Through Reverse Process of GNNs for Heterophilic Graphscited by 10
  11. 2024IN-Flow: Instance Normalization Flow for Non-stationary Time Series Forecastingcited by 6
  12. 2021Invertible Attentioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.