PRIM-cipal components analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised No Free Lunch Theorems (NFLTs) are well studied, yet unsupervised NFLTs remain underexplored. For elliptical distributions, we prove that there exist two equally optimal, scientifically meaningful bump-hunting strategies that are exact opposites, with no universal winner. Specifically, peeling k orthogonal dimensions from ℝd (d ≥ k), retaining an inter-quantile region of probability 1-α per peeled dimension, maximizes total variance and Frobenius norm when the k smallest principal components (called pettiest components) are selected, and minimizes them when the selected dimensions are the k leading principal components. These optima inspire PRIM-based bump-hunting algorithms either by minimizing variance or by minimizing volume, thereby motivating an NFLT. We test our results on the Fashion-MNIST database, showing that peeling the largest principal components captures multiplicity, while peeling the smallest principal components isolates popular styles.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
8 of 27 references.
References · 8
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019The Futility of Bias-Free Learning and Searchcited by 5
- 2020Modal Principal Component Analysiscited by 3
- 2020Mode hunting through active informationcited by 2
- 2024Is it possible to know cosmological fine-tuning?cited by 2
- 2014Unsupervised Bump Hunting Using Principal Componentscited by 1
- 2024Statistical learning does not always entail knowledgecited by 1
- 2025Conserved active informationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.