mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Futility of Bias-Free Learning and Search

arXiv 1907.06010 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Building on the view of machine learning as search, we demonstrate the necessity of bias in learning, quantifying the role of bias (measured relative to a collection of possible datasets, or more generally, information resources) in increasing the probability of success. For a given degree of bias towards a fixed target, we show that the proportion of favorable information resources is strictly bounded from above. Furthermore, we demonstrate that bias is a conserved quantity, such that no algorithm can be favorably biased towards many distinct targets simultaneously. Thus bias encodes trade-offs. The probability of success for a task can also be measured geometrically, as the angle of agreement between what holds for the actual task and what is assumed by the algorithm, represented in its bias. Lastly, finding a favorably biasing distribution over a fixed set of information resources is provably difficult, unless the set of resources itself is already favorable with respect to the given task and algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.