StoSignSGD: Unbiased Structural Stochasticity Fixes SignSGD for Training Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sign-based optimization algorithms, such as SignSGD, have garnered attention for their performance in distributed learning and training large foundation models. Despite their empirical superiority, SignSGD is known to diverge on non-smooth objectives, which are ubiquitous due to ReLUs, max-pools, and mixture-of-experts. To overcome this limitation, we propose StoSignSGD, an algorithm that injects structural stochasticity into the sign operator while maintaining an unbiased update step. In the regime of (online) convex optimization, StoSignSGD rigorously resolves the non-convergence issues of SignSGD, achieving a sharp convergence rate matching the lower bound. For the more challenging non-convex non-smooth optimization, we introduce generalized stationary measures that encompass prior definitions, proving that StoSignSGD improves upon the best-known complexity bounds by dimensional factors. Empirically, StoSignSGD is stable and efficient across diverse large language model (LLM) training regimes. In aggressive low-precision pretraining, which spans both FP8 and the far more demanding FP4 regime where AdamW fails catastrophically, StoSignSGD stays stable and consistently performs the best. It attains a 1.44x to 2.14x speedup over established baselines under FP8. Under 4-bit precision, it improves downstream accuracy on the largest OLMo2-370M model by 1.13 points over the strongest stable baseline, and this advantage grows as both the model size and the data scale up. When fine-tuning 7B LLMs on mathematical reasoning tasks, StoSignSGD also delivers clear gains over both AdamW and SignSGD. Finally, to explain why it works, we develop a sign conversion framework that turns any general optimizer into its unbiased, sign-based counterpart. Using this framework, we decompose the core components of StoSignSGD and run a comprehensive ablation study to validate our design choices.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 123 of its 170 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
123 of 170 references.
References · 123
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
38 more
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
- 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 604
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
- 2024FlashAttention-3: Fast and Accurate Attention with Asynchrony and Low-precisioncited by 507
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
- 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 423
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 20218-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantizationcited by 395
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2021ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Trainingcited by 339
- 2019Error Feedback Fixes SignSGD and other Gradient Compression Schemescited by 306
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 303
- 2019Momentum-Based Variance Reduction in Non-Convex SGDcited by 302
- 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 302
- 2022FP8 Formats for Deep Learningcited by 187
50 most cited of 123 All 123 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Optimizer-Model Consistency: Full Finetuning with the Same Optimizer as Pretraining Forgets Lesscited by 3
- 2026When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Boundscited by 2
- 2026Open Problem: Is AdamW Effective Under Heavy-Tailed Noise?cited by 1
- 2026Adam Converges in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Open Problem: Is AdamW Effective Under Heavy-Tailed Noise?22 Jun 2026
- 2026Adam Converges in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization21 Jun 2026
- 2026Optimizer-Model Consistency: Full Finetuning with the Same Optimizer as Pretraining Forgets Less7 May 2026
- 2026When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Bounds7 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Alignment of large language models with constrained learning
- 2025SR-GRPO: Stable Rank as an Intrinsic Geometric Reward for Large Language Model Alignment
- 2026Deterministic Differentiable Structured Pruning for Large Language Models
- 2024A Probabilistic Perspective on Unlearning and Alignment for Large Language Models
- 2024Information Theoretic Guarantees For Policy Alignment In Large Language Models
- 2025Single-stream Policy Optimization
- 2026MGUP: A Momentum-Gradient Alignment Update Policy for Stochastic Optimization
- 2026SIGMA: Scalable Spectral Insights for LLM Model Collapse