Discovering Novel LLM Experts via Task-Capability Coevolution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Frontier model developers aim to train models continually to possess emergent, diverse capabilities. To extend capabilities, the current pre-training and post-training paradigm requires manually starting training runs with static datasets or reward functions every time. Addressing this limitation, our work pursues the insight that open-endedness (via the coevolution of models and tasks) can discover models with increasingly novel skills in a single run. We introduce a new model development framework that extends coevolution to large language model (LLM) discovery, open-ended textitAssessment Coevolving with Diverse Capabilities (AC/DC). AC/DC evolves both LLMs via model merging and natural language tasks via synthetic data generation. AC/DC discovers growing archives of LLMs that surpass the capabilities of larger LLMs while taking up less GPU memory. In particular, our LLM populations achieve a broader Coverage of expertise than other curated models or baselines on downstream benchmarks, without textitany explicit benchmark optimization. Furthermore, AC/DC improves Coverage over time, continually innovates on tasks and models, and improves performance in multi-agent best-of-N selection. Our findings highlight the potential of coevolution as a means of discovering broader sets of capabilities from base LLMs. Overall, AC/DC brings us one step closer to a profoundly new paradigm of LLM development, where continual improvements to the diversity of model capabilities can be accelerated by leveraging existing models as stepping stones to increasingly powerful models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 157 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
64 of 157 references.
References · 64
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
38 more
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,011
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 425
- 2018AI safety via debatecited by 400
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 356
- 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 344
- 2022The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learningcited by 311
- 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 303
- 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 301
- 2024Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 269
- 2023Challenges and Applications of Large Language Modelscited by 254
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 214
- 2019Paired Open-Ended Trailblazer (POET): Endlessly Generating Increasingly Complex and Diverse Learning Environments and Their Solutionscited by 192
- 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 161
- 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMscited by 114
- 2024Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Datacited by 106
- 2025The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMscited by 101
- 2019AI-GAs: AI-generating algorithms, an alternate paradigm for producing general artificial intelligencecited by 86
- 2023OMNI: Open-endedness via Models of human Notions of Interestingnesscited by 70
- 2025Diverse Preference Optimizationcited by 52
- 2025Wider or Deeper? Scaling LLM Inference-Time Compute with Adaptive Branching Tree Searchcited by 51
- 2025Modifying Large Language Model Post-Training for Diverse Creative Writingcited by 40
- 2024Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Modelscited by 35
- 2025The Common Pile v0.1: An 8TB Dataset of Public Domain and Openly Licensed Textcited by 31
- 2024Regularized Best-of-N Sampling with Minimum Bayes Risk Objective for Language Model Alignmentcited by 25
50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.