ReviewGrounder: Improving Review Substantiveness with Rubric-Guided, Tool-Integrated Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid rise in AI conference submissions has driven increasing exploration of large language models (LLMs) for peer review support. However, LLM-based reviewers often generate superficial, formulaic comments lacking substantive, evidence-grounded feedback. We attribute this to the underutilization of two key components of human reviewing: explicit rubrics and contextual grounding in existing work. To address this, we introduce REVIEWBENCH, a benchmark evaluating review text according to paper-specific rubrics derived from official guidelines, the paper's content, and human-written reviews. We further propose REVIEWGROUNDER, a rubric-guided, tool-integrated multi-agent framework that decomposes reviewing into drafting and grounding stages, enriching shallow drafts via targeted evidence consolidation. Experiments on REVIEWBENCH show that REVIEWGROUNDER, using a Phi-4-14B-based drafter and a GPT-OSS-120B-based grounding stage, consistently outperforms baselines with substantially stronger/larger backbones (e.g., GPT-4.1 and DeepSeek-R1-670B) in both alignment with human judgments and rubric-based review quality across 8 dimensions. The code is available hrefhttps://github.com/EigenTom/ReviewGrounderhere.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 19 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
19 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026OpenResearcher: A Fully Open Pipeline for Long-Horizon Deep Research Trajectory Synthesis17 Mar
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers8 Jan
Other references · 17
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
- 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 195
- 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 142
- 2023The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platformcited by 109
- 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Processcited by 97
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discoverycited by 96
- 2025In-the-Flow Agentic System Optimization for Effective Planning and Tool Usecited by 67
- 2024Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Reviewcited by 49
- 2024Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactionscited by 43
5 more
- 2025Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025cited by 40
- 2025Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewardscited by 34
- 2025Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviewscited by 23
- 2024LLMs as Meta-Reviewers' Assistants: A Case Studycited by 15
- 2023SEA: Sparse Linear Attention with Estimated Attention Maskcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscapecited by 4
- 2026The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishingcited by 1
- 2026RubricReviewer: From Direct Critique to Objective and Comprehensive Rubric-Driven Peer Reviewcited by 0
- 2026The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishing7 Sep 2026
- 2026From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscape7 Jun 2026
- 2026RubricReviewer: From Direct Critique to Objective and Comprehensive Rubric-Driven Peer Review4 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews
- 2026Benchmarking Agentic Review Systems
- 2025MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation
- 2026LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform
- 2026Understanding Dominant Themes in Reviewing Agentic AI-authored Code
- 2026EGTR-Review: Efficient Evidence-Grounded Scientific Peer Review Generation via Multi-Agent Teacher Distillation
- 2026DIAGPaper: Diagnosing Valid and Specific Weaknesses in Scientific Papers via Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2026ScholarPeer: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Peer Review