mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

KMMMU: Evaluation of Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding in Korean Language and Context

arXiv 2604.13058 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.LG cs.MMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal evaluation is strengthened when benchmarks reflect the languages, institutions, and disciplinary conventions that shape expert visual reasoning. We introduce KMMMU, a native Korean benchmark built from Korean-native examination materials. KMMMU contains 3,466 questions spanning nine disciplines and nine visual modality categories. For targeted evaluation on challenging questions and Korean-specific knowledge, we additionally provide KMMMU-Adv and KMMMU-Local, respectively. Experiments show that the strongest evaluated open-weight model reaches 42.05% on the KMMMU, while the best evaluated proprietary model achieves 52.42% on the KMMMU-Adv. Performance varies substantially across disciplines and answer formats, with Korean-specific questions showing gaps of up to 13.43%. Error analysis suggests that inspected failures often involve convention-to-label mapping, few-shot symbolic induction, localized knowledge recall, and domain-specific standards, not reasoning depth alone. KMMMU provides a testbed for native Korean expert-level multimodal understanding beyond English-centric or translation-based evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

Builds on

18 of 38 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  3. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
  4. 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,510
  5. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  6. 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
  7. 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 160
  8. 2023Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 142
  9. 2023SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific Researchcited by 115
  10. 2023SeaEval for Multilingual Foundation Models: From Cross-Lingual Alignment to Cultural Reasoningcited by 94
  11. 2024KMMLU: Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding in Koreancited by 91
  12. 2023The Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 66
6 more
  1. 2024JMMMU: A Japanese Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark for Culture-aware Evaluationcited by 19
  2. 2025Pushing on Multilingual Reasoning Models with Language-Mixed Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 10
  3. 2025KRETA: A Benchmark for Korean Reading and Reasoning in Text-Rich VQA Attuned to Diverse Visual Contextscited by 6
  4. 2025VARCO-VISION-2.0 Technical Reportcited by 6
  5. 2025KOFFVQA: An Objectively Evaluated Free-form VQA Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models in the Korean Languagecited by 5
  6. 2025Evaluating Multimodal Generative AI with Korean Educational Standardscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.