mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cycle-Consistent Search: Question Reconstructability as a Proxy Reward for Search Agent Training

arXiv 2604.12967 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown strong potential for optimizing search agents in complex information retrieval tasks. However, existing approaches predominantly rely on gold supervision, such as ground-truth answers, which is difficult to scale. To address this limitation, we propose Cycle-Consistent Search (CCS), a gold-supervision-free framework for training search agents, inspired by cycle-consistency techniques from unsupervised machine translation and image-to-image translation. Our key hypothesis is that an optimal search trajectory, unlike insufficient or irrelevant ones, serves as a lossless encoding of the question's intent. Consequently, a high-quality trajectory should preserve the information required to accurately reconstruct the original question, thereby inducing a reward signal for policy optimization. However, naive cycle-consistency objectives are vulnerable to information leakage, as reconstruction may rely on superficial lexical cues rather than the underlying search process. To reduce this effect, we apply information bottlenecks, including exclusion of the final response and named entity recognition (NER) masking of search queries. These constraints force reconstruction to rely on retrieved observations together with the structural scaffold, ensuring that the resulting reward signal reflects informational adequacy rather than linguistic redundancy. Experiments on question-answering benchmarks show that CCS achieves performance comparable to supervised baselines while outperforming prior methods that do not rely on gold supervision. These results suggest that CCS provides a scalable training paradigm for training search agents in settings where gold supervision is unavailable.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

40 of 46 references.

References · 40

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  5. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  6. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  7. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  8. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  9. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  10. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  11. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  12. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
28 more
  1. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  2. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  4. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  5. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  6. 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
  7. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
  8. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  9. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  10. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,054
  11. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 911
  12. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 893
  13. 2018Multimodal Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translationcited by 795
  14. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  15. 2017Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation Networkscited by 602
  16. 2025Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Modelscited by 423
  17. 2020LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentioncited by 326
  18. 2025R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 322
  19. 2019K-BERT: Enabling Language Representation with Knowledge Graphcited by 303
  20. 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Representation through Knowledge Integrationcited by 301
  21. 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 272
  22. 2025DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environmentscited by 268
  23. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 253
  24. 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewardscited by 199
  25. 2024FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Researchcited by 165
  26. 2016Dual Learning for Machine Translationcited by 146
  27. 2025ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agentscited by 80
  28. 2021Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation with Generative Language Models Onlycited by 24

Built on by

Not cited yet.