mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Socrates Loss: Unifying Confidence Calibration and Classification by Leveraging the Unknown

arXiv 2604.12245 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks, despite their high accuracy, often exhibit poor confidence calibration, limiting their reliability in high-stakes applications. Current ad-hoc confidence calibration methods attempt to fix this during training but face a fundamental trade-off: two-phase training methods achieve strong classification performance at the cost of training instability and poorer confidence calibration, while single-loss methods are stable but underperform in classification. This paper addresses and mitigates this stability-performance trade-off. We propose Socrates Loss, a novel, unified loss function that explicitly leverages uncertainty by incorporating an auxiliary unknown class, whose predictions directly influence the loss function and a dynamic uncertainty penalty. This unified objective allows the model to be optimized for both classification and confidence calibration simultaneously, without the instability of complex, scheduled losses. We provide theoretical guarantees that our method regularizes the model to prevent miscalibration and overfitting. Across four benchmark datasets and multiple architectures, our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that Socrates Loss consistently improves training stability while achieving more favorable accuracy-calibration trade-off, often converging faster than existing methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

24 of 43 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,043
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,902
  5. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,902
  6. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 986
  7. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 817
  8. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 462
  9. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 388
  10. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 360
  11. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
  12. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
12 more
  1. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  2. 2020Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 113
  3. 2015Posterior calibration and exploratory analysis for natural language processing modelscited by 76
  4. 2021Classifier Calibration: A survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilitiescited by 71
  5. 2019Deep Gamblers: Learning to Abstain with Portfolio Theorycited by 70
  6. 2023What Can We Learn From The Selective Prediction And Uncertainty Estimation Performance Of 523 Imagenet Classifierscited by 35
  7. 2022Calibrated Selective Classificationcited by 32
  8. 2022AdaFocal: Calibration-aware Adaptive Focal Losscited by 32
  9. 2021Meta-Calibration: Learning of Model Calibration Using Differentiable Expected Calibration Errorcited by 28
  10. 2024Confidence Calibration of Classifiers with Many Classescited by 11
  11. 2024Confidence-aware Contrastive Learning for Selective Classificationcited by 7
  12. 2022Transfer learning for ensembles: reducing computation time and keeping the diversitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.