mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can we Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?

arXiv 2604.12051 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

A recent and exciting thread of work focuses on developing methods for watermarking the output of large language models (LLMs). We focus on provably undetectable watermarking-that is, schemes that do not alter the output distribution of the LLM, yet enable embedding a watermark in the output that identifies the output as having been generated by the particular LLM. Furthermore, the watermark should be hard to remove by an adversary that may potentially edit, insert, or delete tokens from the watermarked output. Indeed, recent work (Christ et al. [COLT'24], Christ et al. [CRYPTO'24], Golowich et al. [NeuroIPS'24]) shows how to develop such schemes that are robust against a constant fraction of substitutions, or even against a constant fraction of arbitrary edits. These works, however, make strong assumptions on the entropy present in the output of the LLM. Most notably, they all require constant entropy rate-that is, a constant fraction of the tokens in a sufficiently long substring of the output need to have empirical entropy at least O(log |T|), where T is the alphabet of tokens, and Golowich et al. additionally require T to be larger than the security parameter. In this work, we consider whether we can also watermark the outputs of LLMs when the per-token entropy is just a constant, discarding the dependence on the alphabet size or security parameter. In this regime, we construct: - A watermarking scheme robust against random substitutions (assuming subexponential LPN, as in Christ et al. [CRYPTO'24]) - A watermarking scheme robust against random substitutions and random deletions, given either the additional heuristic assumption that the output of the LLM only introduces random errors (analogous to the assumption made by Christ et al. [CRYPTO'24]) or a construction of a pseudorandom error-correcting code robust to adversarial substitutions and random deletions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 10 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

10 of 13 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Provably Robust Watermarks for Open-Source Language Models24 Oct
  2. 2024New constructions of pseudorandom codes11 Sep
  3. 2024Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codes14 Feb
  4. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  5. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  6. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models25 May
  7. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 3

  1. 2024Ideal Pseudorandom Codescited by 6
  2. 2025Improved Pseudorandom Codes from Permuted Puzzlescited by 4
  3. 2025Black-Box Crypto is Useless for Pseudorandom Codescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Entropy-Guided Watermarking for LLMs: A Test-Time Framework for Robust and Traceable Text Generation
  2. 2025HeavyWater and SimplexWater: Distortion-Free LLM Watermarks for Low-Entropy Next-Token Predictions
  3. 2024Watermarking Low-entropy Generation for Large Language Models: An Unbiased and Low-risk Method
  4. 2025Invisible Entropy: Towards Safe and Efficient Low-Entropy LLM Watermarking
  5. 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models
  6. 2024A Watermark for Black-Box Language Models
  7. 2024Black-Box Detection of Language Model Watermarks
  8. 2025LLM Watermarking Using Mixtures and Statistical-to-Computational Gaps