Inspectable AI for Science: A Research Object Approach to Generative AI Governance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces AI as a Research Object (AI-RO), a paradigm for governing the use of generative AI in scientific research. Instead of debating whether AI is an author or merely a tool, we propose treating AI interactions as structured, inspectable components of the research process. Under this view, the legitimacy of an AI-assisted scientific paper depends on how model use is integrated into the workflow, documented, and made accountable. Drawing on Research Object theory and FAIR principles, we propose a framework for recording model configuration, prompts, and outputs through interaction logs and metadata packaging. These properties are particularly consequential in security and privacy (S&P) research, where provenance artifacts must satisfy confidentiality constraints, integrity guarantees, and auditability requirements that generic disclosure practices do not address. We implement a lightweight writing pipeline in which a language model synthesizes human-authored structured literature review notes under explicit constraints and produces a verifiable provenance record. We present this work as a position supported by an initial demonstrative workflow, arguing that governance of generative AI in science can be implemented as structured documentation, controlled disclosure, and integrity-preserving provenance capture. Based on this example, we outline and motivate a set of necessary future developments required to make such practices practical and widely adoptable.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.
Builds on
10 of 39 references.
References · 10
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 112
- 2024Towards Reproducible LLM Evaluation: Quantifying Uncertainty in LLM Benchmark Scorescited by 25
- 2025Paper2Agent: Reimagining Research Papers As Interactive and Reliable AI Agentscited by 19
- 2026Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review: A Failure Mode Taxonomy of 100 Fabricated Citations at NeurIPS 2025cited by 13
- 2025Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviewscited by 10
- 2023Enough With "Human-AI Collaboration"cited by 6
- 2023Bibliometric Analysis of Publisher and Journal Instructions to Authors on Generative-AI in Academic and Scientific Publishingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.