mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enough With "Human-AI Collaboration"

arXiv 2306.01615 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2023cs.HCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Describing our interaction with Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems as 'collaboration' is well-intentioned, but flawed. Not only is it misleading, but it also takes away the credit of AI 'labour' from the humans behind it, and erases and obscures an often exploitative arrangement between AI producers and consumers. The AI 'collaboration' metaphor is merely the latest episode in a long history of labour appropriation and credit reassignment that disenfranchises labourers in the Global South. I propose that viewing AI as a tool or an instrument, rather than a collaborator, is more accurate, and ultimately fairer.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.