mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Prosociality by Coupling, Not Mere Observation: Homeostatic Sharing in an Inspectable Recurrent Artificial Life Agent

arXiv 2604.10760 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2026cs.MA cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial agents can be made to ``help'' through explicit social rewards, hard-coded prosocial bonuses, or direct access to another agent's state. I isolate a narrower route: homeostatic coupling. Building on ReCoN-Ipsundrum, I add a scalar homeostat and a social coupling channel while keeping action selection self-directed: the planner scores only the actor's predicted internal state, with no partner-welfare reward. In a one-step FoodShareToy, an exact solver finds a switch from EAT to PASS at λ^star ≈ 0.91 for the default state. In a multi-step SocialCorridorWorld, partner-state access without coupling leaves behavior unchanged, whereas coupled agents fetch, carry, and pass food to the partner. Sham lesions preserve helping; coupling-off and shuffled-partner lesions abolish it. A coupling/load sweep shows that coupling creates a low-load helping regime but does not guarantee rescue under higher metabolic load. This is not a claim about empathy, altruism, consciousness, or moral status. It is a minimal ALife demonstration that, in this controller, partner-state access is behaviorally inert unless partner distress is routed into self-regulation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2026.

Builds on

3 of 11 references.

References · 3

  1. 2014Embodied social interaction constitutes social cognition in pairs of humans: A minimalist virtual reality experimentcited by 2
  2. 2025Homeostatic Coupling for Prosocial Behaviorcited by 1
  3. 2026ReCoN-Ipsundrum: An Inspectable Recurrent Persistence Loop Agent with Affect-Coupled Control and Mechanism-Linked Consciousness Indicator Assayscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.