Geometric Probing for Algorithm Selection in Continuous Black-Box Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated algorithm selection for continuous black-box optimization depends on what information is acquired from a problem under a limited probing budget and how that information is represented. We introduce a geometric probing framework that samples multi-scale two-dimensional restrictions across location, orientation, and scale, and encodes their normalized objective-value maps with validity-aware convolutional processing and permutation-invariant aggregation. We compare our method with classical ELA and Deep-ELA under matched budgets, within-problem and problem-level transfer, fusion, representation, and budget analyses. We further disentangle probe acquisition from probe processing by controlled ablation. The results show that the proposed visual representation exposes solver-performance information complementary to ELA-family features and retains a relative advantage for relative expected runtime under problem-level transfer, while greater coverage, feature richness, or predictive accessibility alone does not guarantee better selection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 42 references.
References · 20
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2018Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectivescited by 111
- 2017Automated Algorithm Selection on Continuous Black-Box Problems By Combining Exploratory Landscape Analysis and Machine Learningcited by 33
- 2020Exploratory Landscape Analysis is Strongly Sensitive to the Sampling Strategycited by 27
- 2024Toward Automated Algorithm Design: A Survey and Practical Guide to Meta-Black-Box-Optimizationcited by 23
- 2022Automated Algorithm Selection: from Feature-Based to Feature-Free Approachescited by 13
- 2023DoE2Vec: Deep-learning Based Features for Exploratory Landscape Analysiscited by 12
- 2016Evolving the Structure of Evolution Strategiescited by 11
- 2023Modular Differential Evolutioncited by 11
- 2023MA-BBOB: A Problem Generator for Black-Box Optimization Using Affine Combinations and Shiftscited by 11
- 2024Deep-ELA: Deep Exploratory Landscape Analysis with Self-Supervised Pretrained Transformers for Single- and Multi-Objective Continuous Optimization Problemscited by 9
- 2016COCO: Performance Assessmentcited by 7
8 more
- 2025Landscape Features in Single-Objective Continuous Optimization: Have We Hit a Wall in Algorithm Selection Generalization?cited by 7
- 2024Using the Empirical Attainment Function for Analyzing Single-objective Black-box Optimization Algorithmscited by 6
- 2024Impact of Training Instance Selection on Automated Algorithm Selection Models for Numerical Black-box Optimizationcited by 5
- 2024Generalization Ability of Feature-based Performance Prediction Models: A Statistical Analysis across Benchmarkscited by 4
- 2025MECHBench: A Set of Black-Box Optimization Benchmarks originated from Structural Mechanicscited by 4
- 2024A Survey of Features Used for Representing Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025The Pitfalls of Benchmarking in Algorithm Selection: What We Are Getting Wrongcited by 3
- 2025Randomness as Reference: Benchmark Metric for Optimization in Engineeringcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.