mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometric Probing for Algorithm Selection in Continuous Black-Box Optimization

arXiv 2604.09095 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2026cs.LG math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated algorithm selection for continuous black-box optimization depends on what information is acquired from a problem under a limited probing budget and how that information is represented. We introduce a geometric probing framework that samples multi-scale two-dimensional restrictions across location, orientation, and scale, and encodes their normalized objective-value maps with validity-aware convolutional processing and permutation-invariant aggregation. We compare our method with classical ELA and Deep-ELA under matched budgets, within-problem and problem-level transfer, fusion, representation, and budget analyses. We further disentangle probe acquisition from probe processing by controlled ablation. The results show that the proposed visual representation exposes solver-performance information complementary to ELA-family features and retains a relative advantage for relative expected runtime under problem-level transfer, while greater coverage, feature richness, or predictive accessibility alone does not guarantee better selection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

Builds on

20 of 42 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  2. 2018Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectivescited by 111
  3. 2017Automated Algorithm Selection on Continuous Black-Box Problems By Combining Exploratory Landscape Analysis and Machine Learningcited by 33
  4. 2020Exploratory Landscape Analysis is Strongly Sensitive to the Sampling Strategycited by 27
  5. 2024Toward Automated Algorithm Design: A Survey and Practical Guide to Meta-Black-Box-Optimizationcited by 23
  6. 2022Automated Algorithm Selection: from Feature-Based to Feature-Free Approachescited by 13
  7. 2023DoE2Vec: Deep-learning Based Features for Exploratory Landscape Analysiscited by 12
  8. 2016Evolving the Structure of Evolution Strategiescited by 11
  9. 2023Modular Differential Evolutioncited by 11
  10. 2023MA-BBOB: A Problem Generator for Black-Box Optimization Using Affine Combinations and Shiftscited by 11
  11. 2024Deep-ELA: Deep Exploratory Landscape Analysis with Self-Supervised Pretrained Transformers for Single- and Multi-Objective Continuous Optimization Problemscited by 9
  12. 2016COCO: Performance Assessmentcited by 7
8 more
  1. 2025Landscape Features in Single-Objective Continuous Optimization: Have We Hit a Wall in Algorithm Selection Generalization?cited by 7
  2. 2024Using the Empirical Attainment Function for Analyzing Single-objective Black-box Optimization Algorithmscited by 6
  3. 2024Impact of Training Instance Selection on Automated Algorithm Selection Models for Numerical Black-box Optimizationcited by 5
  4. 2024Generalization Ability of Feature-based Performance Prediction Models: A Statistical Analysis across Benchmarkscited by 4
  5. 2025MECHBench: A Set of Black-Box Optimization Benchmarks originated from Structural Mechanicscited by 4
  6. 2024A Survey of Features Used for Representing Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimizationcited by 3
  7. 2025The Pitfalls of Benchmarking in Algorithm Selection: What We Are Getting Wrongcited by 3
  8. 2025Randomness as Reference: Benchmark Metric for Optimization in Engineeringcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.