mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Preference Redirection via Attention Concentration: An Attack on Computer Use Agents

arXiv 2604.08005 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Advancements in multimodal foundation models have enabled the development of Computer Use Agents (CUAs) capable of autonomously interacting with GUI environments. As CUAs are not restricted to certain tools, they allow to automate more complex agentic tasks but at the same time open up new security vulnerabilities. While prior work has concentrated on the language modality, the vulnerability of the vision modality has received less attention. In this paper, we introduce PRAC, a novel attack that, unlike prior work targeting the VLM output directly, manipulates the model's internal preferences by redirecting its attention toward a stealthy adversarial patch. We show that PRAC is able to manipulate the selection process of a CUA on an online shopping platform towards a chosen target product. While we require white-box access to the model for the creation of the attack, we show that our attack generalizes to fine-tuned versions of the same model, presenting a critical threat as multiple companies build specific CUAs based on open weights models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

Builds on

41 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety8 Jul
  2. 2025OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents17 Jun
  3. 2025TRAP: Targeted Redirecting of Agentic Preferences29 May
  4. 2025WebInject: Prompt Injection Attack to Web Agents16 May
  5. 2025WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks22 Apr
  6. 2025The Obvious Invisible Threat: LLM-Powered GUI Agents' Vulnerability to Fine-Print Injections15 Apr
  7. 2025MIP against Agent: Malicious Image Patches Hijacking Multimodal OS Agents13 Mar
  8. 2025Commercial LLM Agents Are Already Vulnerable to Simple Yet Dangerous Attacks12 Feb
  9. 2024Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-ups4 Nov
  10. 2024AdvAgent: Controllable Blackbox Red-teaming on Web Agents22 Oct
  11. 2024EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakage17 Sep
  12. 2024Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM Agents18 Jun

Other references · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  6. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  7. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  8. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agentscited by 584
  9. 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 457
  10. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
  11. 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 450
  12. 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
17 more
  1. 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 424
  2. 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 281
  3. 2024Agent S: An Open Agentic Framework that Uses Computers Like a Humancited by 182
  4. 2023How Robust is Google's Bard to Adversarial Image Attacks?cited by 177
  5. 2023Image Hijacks: Adversarial Images can Control Generative Models at Runtimecited by 165
  6. 2025Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoningcited by 159
  7. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 142
  8. 2025Qwen3Guard Technical Reportcited by 125
  9. 2025GTA1: GUI Test-time Scaling Agentcited by 102
  10. 2025Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Groundingcited by 78
  11. 2024Active-Dormant Attention Heads: Mechanistically Demystifying Extreme-Token Phenomena in LLMscited by 54
  12. 2022Give Me Your Attention: Dot-Product Attention Considered Harmful for Adversarial Patch Robustnesscited by 23
  13. 2024Self-Reflection Makes Large Language Models Safer, Less Biased, and Ideologically Neutralcited by 20
  14. 2025Perceptual-Evidence Anchored Reinforced Learning for Multimodal Reasoningcited by 20
  15. 2025SEA-LION: Southeast Asian Languages in One Networkcited by 17
  16. 2025On the Robustness of GUI Grounding Models Against Image Attackscited by 14
  17. 2026From Narrow to Panoramic Vision: Attention-Guided Cold-Start Reshapes Multimodal Reasoningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Cross-Modal Content Optimization for Steering Web Agent Preferences
  2. 2025A Systematization of Security Vulnerabilities in Computer Use Agents
  3. 2025DPO Learning with LLMs-Judge Signal for Computer Use Agents
  4. 2026CAVEAT: Towards Robust Computer-Use Agents in Incentive-Misaligned Environments
  5. 2023Can Large Language Models Change User Preference Adversarially?
  6. 2026CAPTURE: Disentangling Preference Drift from Memory Poisoning in Personalized LLM Agents
  7. 2026ADeptS-Bench: Measuring the Trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents Across Devices
  8. 2025LaSM: Layer-wise Scaling Mechanism for Defending Pop-up Attack on GUI Agents