mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Compatibility of Face Embeddings Across Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2604.07282 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated face recognition has made rapid strides over the past decade due to the unprecedented rise of deep neural network (DNN) models that can be trained for domain-specific tasks. At the same time, large foundation models that are pretrained on broad vision or vision-language tasks have shown impressive generalization across diverse domains, including biometrics. This raises an important question: Do different DNN models---both domain-specific and foundation models---encode facial identity in similar ways, despite being trained on different datasets, loss functions, and architectures? In this regard, we directly analyze the geometric structure of embedding spaces imputed by different DNN models. Treating embeddings of face images as point clouds, we study whether simple affine transformations can align face representations of one model with another. Our findings reveal substantial cross-model compatibility: low-capacity linear mappings substantially improve cross-model face recognition over unaligned baselines for both identification and verification, including across foundation models never trained for face recognition. Alignment patterns generalize across datasets and vary systematically across model families, indicating representational convergence in facial identity encoding. These findings reframe independently trained templates as transferable rather than revocable, with implications for interoperability, ensemble design, and biometric template security.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 41 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  7. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  8. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  9. 2023Kosmos-2: Grounding Multimodal Large Language Models to the Worldcited by 1,075
  10. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
  11. 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
  12. 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 451
11 more
  1. 2023Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Taskscited by 403
  2. 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 390
  3. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 332
  4. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
  5. 2018A robust self-learning method for fully unsupervised cross-lingual mappings of word embeddingscited by 145
  6. 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 128
  7. 2024KeyPoint Relative Position Encoding for Face Recognitioncited by 37
  8. 2025Benchmarking Foundation Models for Zero-Shot Biometric Taskscited by 13
  9. 202550 Years of Automated Face Recognitioncited by 13
  10. 2025Foundation versus Domain-specific Models: Performance Comparison, Fusion, and Explainability in Face Recognitioncited by 8
  11. 2025Deep CNN Face Matchers Inherently Support Revocable Biometric Templatescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.