mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contraction-Aligned Analysis of Soft Bellman Residual Minimization with Weighted Lp-Norm for Markov Decision Problem

arXiv 2604.06837 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The problem of solving Markov decision processes under function approximation remains a fundamental challenge, even under linear function approximation settings. A key difficulty arises from a geometric mismatch: while the Bellman optimality operator is contractive in the Linfty-norm, commonly used objectives such as projected value iteration and Bellman residual minimization rely on L2-based formulations. To enable gradient-based optimization, we consider a soft formulation of Bellman residual minimization and extend it to a generalized weighted Lp -norm. We show that this formulation aligns the optimization objective with the contraction geometry of the Bellman operator as p increases, and derive corresponding performance error bounds. Our analysis provides a principled connection between residual minimization and Bellman contraction, leading to improved control of error propagation while remaining compatible with gradient-based optimization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 25 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
  2. 2022Why Should I Trust You, Bellman? The Bellman Error is a Poor Replacement for Value Errorcited by 32
  3. 2022Regularized Q-learningcited by 16
  4. 2024A Smooth Polynomial Lyapunov Certificate for Convergence of Q-Learning and Its Smooth Variantscited by 1
  5. 2026Bellman Residual Minimization for Control: Geometry, Stationarity, and Convergencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.