Beyond Facts: Benchmarking Distributional Reading Comprehension in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While most reading comprehension benchmarks for LLMs focus on factual information that can be answered by localizing specific textual evidence, many real-world tasks require understanding distributional information, such as population-level trends and preferences expressed across collections of text. We introduce Text2DistBench, a reading comprehension benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to infer distributional knowledge from natural language. Built from real-world YouTube comments about movie and music entities, the benchmark provides models with entity metadata and associated comments, and requires them to answer distributional questions, such as estimating the proportions of positive and negative comments, or identifying the most and second most frequent topics discussed among viewers. To support reliable and long-term evaluation, the construction pipeline of Text2DistBench is fully automated and continuously updated to incorporate newly emerging entities over time. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that while models substantially outperform random baselines, performance varies widely across different distribution types and characteristics. These findings highlight both the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs in distributional reading comprehension and demonstrate the value of Text2DistBench as a practical and scalable testbed for future research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.
Builds on
17 of 22 references.
References · 17
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
- 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
- 2017Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documentscited by 190
- 2024Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Modelscited by 162
- 2023Having Beer after Prayer? Measuring Cultural Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 153
- 2019QuaRTz: An Open-Domain Dataset of Qualitative Relationship Questionscited by 89
- 2024WorldValuesBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Cultural Value Awareness of Language Modelscited by 59
- 2024Benchmarking Distributional Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 58
- 2023Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Modelscited by 42
5 more
- 2016WikiReading: A Novel Large-scale Language Understanding Task over Wikipediacited by 26
- 2024What Are the Odds? Language Models Are Capable of Probabilistic Reasoningcited by 25
- 2025Enough Coin Flips Can Make LLMs Act Bayesiancited by 19
- 2024LLM Chain Ensembles for Scalable and Accurate Data Annotationcited by 11
- 2025Labeling Free-text Data using Language Model Ensemblescited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.