mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics-Aware Video Instance Removal Benchmark

arXiv 2604.05898 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Video Instance Removal (VIR) requires removing target objects while maintaining background integrity and physical consistency, such as specular reflections and illumination interactions. Despite advancements in text-guided editing, current benchmarks primarily assess visual plausibility, often overlooking the physical causalities, such as lingering shadows, triggered by object removal. We introduce the Physics-Aware Video Instance Removal (PVIR) benchmark, featuring 95 high-quality videos annotated with instance-accurate masks and removal prompts. PVIR is partitioned into Simple and Hard subsets, the latter explicitly targeting complex physical interactions. We evaluate four representative methods, PISCO-Removal, UniVideo, DiffuEraser, and CoCoCo, using a decoupled human evaluation protocol across three dimensions to isolate semantic, visual, and spatial failures: instruction following, rendering quality, and edit exclusivity. Our results show that PISCO-Removal and UniVideo achieve state-of-the-art performance, while DiffuEraser frequently introduces blurring artifacts and CoCoCo struggles significantly with instruction following. The persistent performance drop on the Hard subset highlights the ongoing challenge of recovering complex physical side effects.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

Builds on

24 of 28 references.

References · 24

  1. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
  4. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
  5. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,428
  6. 2022Tune-A-Video: One-Shot Tuning of Image Diffusion Models for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 961
  7. 2021Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutionscited by 738
  8. 2018Free-Form Image Inpainting with Gated Convolutioncited by 594
  9. 2025VACE: All-in-One Video Creation and Editingcited by 479
  10. 2023TokenFlow: Consistent Diffusion Features for Consistent Video Editingcited by 442
  11. 2023Video-P2P: Video Editing with Cross-attention Controlcited by 314
  12. 2018YouTube-VOS: Sequence-to-Sequence Video Object Segmentationcited by 232
12 more
  1. 2023ProPainter: Improving Propagation and Transformer for Video Inpaintingcited by 197
  2. 2022Towards An End-to-End Framework for Flow-Guided Video Inpaintingcited by 113
  3. 2021FuseFormer: Fusing Fine-Grained Information in Transformers for Video Inpaintingcited by 95
  4. 2025UniVideo: Unified Understanding, Generation, and Editing for Videoscited by 87
  5. 2025DiffuEraser: A Diffusion Model for Video Inpaintingcited by 72
  6. 2024CoCoCo: Improving Text-Guided Video Inpainting for Better Consistency, Controllability and Compatibilitycited by 50
  7. 2021AdaPool: Exponential Adaptive Pooling for Information-Retaining Downsamplingcited by 47
  8. 2025ROSE: Remove Objects with Side Effects in Videoscited by 38
  9. 2025IVEBench: Modern Benchmark Suite for Instruction-Guided Video Editing Assessmentcited by 28
  10. 2026PISCO: Precise Video Instance Insertion with Sparse Controlcited by 10
  11. 2026VOID: Video Object and Interaction Deletioncited by 9
  12. 2026The Pulse of Motion: Measuring Physical Frame Rate from Visual Dynamicscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.