Enhancing sample efficiency in reinforcement-learning-based flow control: replacing the critic with an adaptive reduced-order model
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL with diffusion and flow models
Abstract (arXiv)
Model-free deep reinforcement learning (DRL) methods suffer from poor sample efficiency. To overcome this limitation, this work introduces an adaptive reduced-order-model (ROM)-based reinforcement learning framework for active flow control. In contrast to conventional actor--critic architectures, the proposed approach leverages a ROM to estimate the gradient information required for controller optimization. The design of the ROM structure incorporates physical insights. The ROM integrates a linear dynamical system and a neural ordinary differential equation (NODE) for estimating the nonlinearity in the flow. The parameters of the linear component are identified via operator inference, while the NODE is trained in a data-driven manner using gradient-based optimization. During controller--environment interactions, the ROM is continuously updated with newly collected data, enabling adaptive refinement of the model. The controller is then optimized through differentiable simulation of the ROM. The proposed ROM-based DRL framework is validated on two canonical flow control problems: Blasius boundary layer flow and flow past a square cylinder. For the Blasius boundary layer, the proposed method effectively reduces to a single-episode system identification and controller optimization process, yet it yields controllers that outperform traditional linear designs and achieve performance comparable to DRL approaches with minimal data. For the flow past a square cylinder, the proposed method achieves superior drag reduction with significantly fewer exploration data compared with DRL approaches. The work addresses a key component of model-free DRL control algorithms and lays the foundation for designing more sample-efficient DRL-based active flow controllers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL with diffusion and flow models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 6 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
6 of 77 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 5
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2023β-Variational autoencoders and transformers for reduced-order modelling of fluid flowscited by 77
- 2022Data-Driven Modeling and Prediction of Non-Linearizable Dynamics via Spectral Submanifoldscited by 25
- 2020Meta-SAC: Auto-tune the Entropy Temperature of Soft Actor-Critic via Metagradientcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Towards Active Flow Control Strategies Through Deep Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Control of Strongly-Disturbed Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows
- 2026Offline Reinforcement Learning for Fluid Controls: Data-based Multi-observational Policy Extraction
- 2024Optimal Parallelization Strategies for Active Flow Control in Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics
- 2026Heuristic Learning for Active Flow Control Using Coding Agents
- 2025Invariant Control Strategies for Active Flow Control using Graph Neural Networks
- 2025Physics-informed Neural-operator Predictive Control for Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flows
- 2024Real-World Fluid Directed Rigid Body Control via Deep Reinforcement Learning