mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

StableTTA: Improving Vision Model Performance by Training-free Test-Time Adaptation Methods

arXiv 2604.04552 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensemble methods improve predictive performance but often incur high memory and computational costs. We identify an aggregation instability induced by nonlinear projection and voting operations. To address both efficiency challenges and this inconsistency, we propose StableTTA, a training-free test-time adaptation method with two variants. StableTTA-I targets coherent-batch inference settings, where temporally or semantically adjacent observations are likely to belong to the same class. Examples include burst photography, video streams, robotics perception, and industrial inspection. Under coherent-batch inference, StableTTA-I substantially improves prediction consistency and accuracy through variance-aware logit aggregation. StableTTA-II establishes feature-level cropping, enabling efficient logit aggregation with a single forward pass on a single model backbone. Experiments on ImageNet-1K across 71 models demonstrate that StableTTA-I consistently improves prediction accuracy under coherent-batch inference, while StableTTA-II provides lightweight and architecture-agnostic accuracy improvements with minimal computational overhead. These results suggest that inference-time semantic coherence and aggregation stability provide useful perspectives for improving practical test-time adaptation systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.

Builds on

32 of 43 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  8. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  9. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  10. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  11. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  12. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
20 more
  1. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  2. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  3. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  4. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  5. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  6. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  7. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  8. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  9. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
  10. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
  11. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  12. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  13. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
  14. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  15. 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
  16. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 413
  17. 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 121
  18. 2020Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time Augmentationcited by 61
  19. 2020Learning Loss for Test-Time Augmentationcited by 56
  20. 2025Test-time augmentation improves efficiency in conformal predictioncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.