Stable and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Educational Data with Empirical Marginals: A Copula-Based Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To advance Educational Data Mining (EDM) within strict privacy-protecting regulatory frameworks, researchers must develop methods that enable data-driven analysis while protecting sensitive student information. Synthetic data generation is one such approach, enabling the release of statistically generated samples instead of real student records; however, existing deep learning and parametric generators often distort marginal distributions and degrade under iterative regeneration, leading to distribution drift and progressive loss of distributional support that compromise reliability. In response, we introduce the Non-Parametric Gaussian Copula (NPGC), a plug-and-play synthesis method that replaces deep learning and parametric optimization with empirical statistical anchoring to preserve the observed marginal distributions while modeling dependencies through a copula framework. NPGC integrates Differential Privacy (DP) at both the marginal and correlation levels, supports heterogeneous variable types, and treats missing data as an explicit state to retain informative absence patterns. We evaluate NPGC against deep learning and parametric baselines on five benchmark datasets and demonstrate that it remains stable across multiple regeneration cycles and achieves competitive downstream performance at substantially lower computational cost. We further validate NPGC through deployment in a real-world online learning platform, demonstrating its practicality for privacy-preserving research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
25 of 58 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
- 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 377
- 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
- 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
- 2017VEEGAN: Reducing Mode Collapse in GANs using Implicit Variational Learningcited by 200
- 2023Mixed-Type Tabular Data Synthesis with Score-based Diffusion in Latent Spacecited by 186
- 2021CTAB-GAN: Effective Table Data Synthesizingcited by 156
13 more
- 2018Synthesizing Tabular Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 92
- 2022STaSy: Score-based Tabular data Synthesiscited by 86
- 2023CoDi: Co-evolving Contrastive Diffusion Models for Mixed-type Tabular Synthesiscited by 78
- 2023Synthcity: facilitating innovative use cases of synthetic data in different data modalitiescited by 76
- 2022CTAB-GAN+: Enhancing Tabular Data Synthesiscited by 70
- 2023FinDiff: Diffusion Models for Financial Tabular Data Generationcited by 41
- 2023Automating Human Tutor-Style Programming Feedback: Leveraging GPT-4 Tutor Model for Hint Generation and GPT-3.5 Student Model for Hint Validationcited by 29
- 2024How Realistic Is Your Synthetic Data? Constraining Deep Generative Models for Tabular Datacited by 29
- 2023AutoDiff: combining Auto-encoder and Diffusion model for tabular data synthesizingcited by 24
- 2023Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmarkcited by 23
- 2024Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directionscited by 14
- 2024Tabular Data Generation Models: An In-Depth Survey and Performance Benchmarks with Extensive Tuningcited by 7
- 2024Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxificationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.