mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causality Laundering: Denial-Feedback Leakage in Tool-Calling LLM Agents

arXiv 2604.04035 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Tool-calling LLM agents can read private data, invoke external services, and trigger real-world actions, creating a security problem at the point of tool execution. We identify a denial-feedback leakage pattern, which we term causality laundering, in which an adversary probes a protected action, learns from the denial outcome, and exfiltrates the inferred information through a later seemingly benign tool call. This attack is not captured by flat provenance tracking alone because the leaked information arises from causal influence of the denied action, not direct data flow. We present the Agentic Reference Monitor (ARM), a runtime enforcement layer that mediates every tool invocation by consulting a provenance graph over tool calls, returned data, field-level provenance, and denied actions. ARM propagates trust through an integrity lattice and augments the graph with counterfactual edges from denied-action nodes, enabling enforcement over both transitive data dependencies and denial-induced causal influence. In a controlled evaluation on three representative attack scenarios, ARM blocks causality laundering, transitive taint propagation, and mixed-provenance field misuse that a flat provenance baseline misses, while adding sub-millisecond policy evaluation overhead. These results suggest that denial-aware causal provenance is a useful abstraction for securing tool-calling agent systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Noticing the Watcher: LLM Agents Can Infer CoT Monitoring from Blocking Feedback14 Mar
  2. 2026AgentSentry: Mitigating Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents via Temporal Causal Diagnostics and Context Purification26 Feb
  3. 2026Formal Policy Enforcement for Real-World Agentic Systems18 Feb
  4. 2026CausalArmor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attribution8 Feb
  5. 2025AgentArmor: Enforcing Program Analysis on Agent Runtime Trace to Defend Against Prompt Injection2 Aug
  6. 2025RTBAS: Defending LLM Agents Against Prompt Injection and Privacy Leakage13 Feb
  7. 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents19 Jun

Other references · 7

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  3. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  4. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructionscited by 441
  5. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
  6. 2024Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks With Spotlightingcited by 233
  7. 2025Securing AI Agents with Information-Flow Controlcited by 108

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Granularity Mismatch in Agent Security: Argument-Level Provenance Solves Enforcement and Isolates the LLM Reasoning Bottleneck
  2. 2026Context-Fractured Decomposition Attacks on Tool-Using LLM Agents: Exploiting Artifact Provenance Gaps
  3. 2026From Agent Traces to Trust: A Survey of Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents
  4. 2026PACE: Provenance-Aware Capability Enforcement for Tool-Using LLM Agents
  5. 2026Aligning Provenance with Authorization: A Dual-Graph Defense for LLM Agents
  6. 2026Structurally Close, Temporally Distant: Measuring Security Exposure in Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  7. 2026The Gate Is Only as Honest as Its Contracts: ContractGuard for the Contract Layer of Risk-Aware Causal Gating
  8. 2026Memory Provenance Laundering in LLM Agents: A Non-Amplification Firewall for Persistent Memory