mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BridgeRAG: Training-Free Bridge-Conditioned Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering

arXiv 2604.03384 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2026cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-hop retrieval is not a single-step relevance problem: later-hop evidence should be ranked by its utility conditioned on retrieved bridge evidence, not by similarity to the original query alone. We present BridgeRAG, a training-free, graph-free retrieval method for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over multi-hop questions that operationalizes this view with a tripartite scorer s(q,b,c) over (question, bridge, candidate). BridgeRAG separates coverage from scoring: dual-entity ANN expansion broadens the second-hop candidate pool, while a bridge-conditioned LLM judge identifies the active reasoning chain among competing candidates without any offline graph or proposition index. Across four controlled experiments we show that this conditioning signal is (i) selective: +2.55pp on parallel-chain queries (p<0.001) vs. ~0 on single-chain subtypes; (ii) irreplaceable: substituting the retrieved passage with generated SVO query text reduces R@5 by 2.1pp, performing worse than even the lowest-SVO-similarity pool passage; (iii) predictable: cos(b,g2) correlates with per-query gain (Spearman rho=0.104, p<0.001); and (iv) mechanistically precise: bridge conditioning causes productive re-rankings (18.7% flip-win rate on parallel-chain vs. 0.6% on single-chain), not merely more churn. Combined with lightweight coverage expansion and percentile-rank score fusion, BridgeRAG achieves the best published training-free R@5 under matched benchmark evaluation on all three standard MHQA benchmarks without a graph database or any training: 0.8146 on MuSiQue (+3.1pp vs. PropRAG, +6.8pp vs. HippoRAG2), 0.9527 on 2WikiMultiHopQA (+1.2pp vs. PropRAG), and 0.9875 on HotpotQA (+1.35pp vs. PropRAG).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Comprehensive Evaluation of Transformer-Based Question Answering Models and RAG-Enhanced Design
  2. 2026PAR2-RAG: Planned Active Retrieval and Reasoning for Multi-Hop Question Answering
  3. 2025StepChain GraphRAG: Reasoning Over Knowledge Graphs for Multi-Hop Question Answering
  4. 2025Memory-Aware and Uncertainty-Guided Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering
  5. 2024EfficientRAG: Efficient Retriever for Multi-Hop Question Answering
  6. 2024Tree of Reviews: A Tree-based Dynamic Iterative Retrieval Framework for Multi-hop Question Answering
  7. 2026Beyond One-Shot Expansion: Contrastive Evidence Exploration for Multi-Hop Retrieval
  8. 2026A Matryoshka Hierarchical RAG for Efficient Multi-Hop Question Answering