Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Advantage Sign Robustness
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward hacking and misspecification
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward models (RMs) used in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) are vulnerable to reward hacking: as the policy maximizes a learned proxy reward, true quality plateaus or degrades. We make the assumption that reward hacking is often caused by flipped advantage signs: instead of reducing the likelihood of a bad response, a flipped sign causes the update to increase it. By considering an adversarial perturbation in the RM parameter space, we can derive a certified sign-preservation radius, which is the smallest perturbation that can flip the advantage sign during policy optimization. Based on this formulation, we propose Sign-Certified Policy Optimization (SignCert-PO), down-weighting non-robust completions in the policy gradient update. Unlike prior approaches that require multiple RMs or access to the RM training data, SignCert-PO is lightweight and operates purely at the policy optimization stage using only the RM parameters and on-policy completions. On TL;DR summarization and AlpacaFarm benchmarks, SignCert-PO consistently achieves a better win rate than baselines and reduces reward hacking.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward hacking and misspecification, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
- 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 231
7 more
- 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 200
- 2024Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignmentcited by 157
- 2025The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gainscited by 28
- 2025Mitigating Reward Over-Optimization in RLHF via Behavior-Supported Regularizationcited by 14
- 2025Off-Policy Corrected Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 6
- 2025On Symmetric Losses for Robust Policy Optimization with Noisy Preferencescited by 4
- 2025Portable Reward Tuning: Towards Reusable Fine-Tuning across Different Pretrained Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reward Shaping to Mitigate Reward Hacking in RLHF
- 2026Gradient Regularization Mitigates Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback and Verifiable Rewards
- 2026Countdown-Code: A Testbed for Studying The Emergence and Generalization of Reward Hacking in RLVR
- 2025Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling for Stable RLHF: Detecting and Mitigating Reward Hacking
- 2026Adversarial Reward Auditing for Active Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking
- 2026IR3: Contrastive Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking
- 2025Adversarial Training of Reward Models
- 2026Multimodal Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning