Efficient Logistic Regression with Mixture of Sigmoids
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper studies the Exponential Weights (EW) algorithm with an isotropic Gaussian prior for online logistic regression. We show that the near-optimal worst-case regret bound O(dlog(Bn)) for EW, established by Kakade and Ng (2005) against the best linear predictor of norm at most B, can be achieved with total worst-case computational complexity O(B3 n5). This substantially improves on the O(B18n37) complexity of prior work achieving the same guarantee (Foster et al., 2018). Beyond efficiency, we analyze the large-B regime under linear separability: after rescaling by B, the EW posterior converges as B→∞ to a standard Gaussian truncated to the version cone. Accordingly, the predictor converges to a solid-angle vote over separating directions and, on every fixed-margin slice of this cone, the mode of the corresponding truncated Gaussian is aligned with the hard-margin SVM direction. Using this geometry, we derive non-asymptotic regret bounds showing that once B exceeds a margin-dependent threshold, the regret becomes independent of B and grows only logarithmically with the inverse margin. Overall, our results show that EW can be both computationally tractable and geometrically adaptive in online classification.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2018Log-concave sampling: Metropolis-Hastings algorithms are fastcited by 118
- 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 85
- 2020Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 57
- 2015Sampling from a log-concave distribution with Projected Langevin Monte Carlocited by 52
- 2015Fast rates in statistical and online learningcited by 47
- 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 45
- 2023Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Logistic Regression at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 42
- 2018Logistic Regression: The Importance of Being Impropercited by 41
- 2014Logistic Regression: Tight Bounds for Stochastic and Online Optimizationcited by 31
- 2018Cleaning up the neighborhood: A full classification for adversarial partial monitoringcited by 16
8 more
- 2020Efficient improper learning for online logistic regressioncited by 16
- 2021Mixability made efficient: Fast online multiclass logistic regressioncited by 12
- 2020Logistic Regression Regret: What's the Catch?cited by 10
- 2021Efficient Methods for Online Multiclass Logistic Regressioncited by 10
- 2023High-Probability Risk Bounds via Sequential Predictorscited by 10
- 2025Minimax Optimal Convergence of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression via Large and Adaptive Stepsizescited by 7
- 2022Precise Regret Bounds for Log-loss via a Truncated Bayesian Algorithmcited by 5
- 2025Instance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Nonstochastic Linear Partial Monitoringcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.