EMS: Multi-Agent Voting via Efficient Majority-then-Stopping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Majority voting is the standard for aggregating multi-agent responses into a final decision. However, traditional methods typically require all agents to complete their reasoning before aggregation begins, leading to significant computational overhead, as many responses become redundant once a majority consensus is achieved. In this work, we formulate efficient multi-agent voting as a reliability-aware agent scheduling problem and propose Efficient Majority-then-Stopping (EMS) to improve reasoning efficiency. EMS first estimates a Task-Conditioned Reliability Ordering (TCRO) for each agent by retrieving its historical consensus evidence on semantically similar queries, and then invoking agents in descending reliability order. Next, Adaptive Incremental Voting (AIV) terminates the process once the current leading answer cannot be overturned by any possible votes from the remaining agents, and returns this answer. Finally, Reliability History Updating (RHU) updates only the invoked agents according to their consensus with the final decision. Extensive evaluations across five benchmarks show that EMS preserves the accuracy of Majority Voting while reducing the average number of invoked agents by 35% and token consumption by 44%, respectively. The code is available at https://github.com/fuyu66/EMS.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
31 of 38 references.
References · 31
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 752
19 more
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
- 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
- 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
- 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 533
- 2024More Agents Is All You Needcited by 174
- 2023Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Modelscited by 129
- 2025Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systemscited by 125
- 2025Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologiescited by 106
- 2025MasRouter: Learning to Route LLMs for Multi-Agent Systemscited by 80
- 2025Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?cited by 74
- 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 73
- 2024A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasonerscited by 73
- 2024GroupDebate: Enhancing the Efficiency of Multi-Agent Debate Using Group Discussioncited by 64
- 2025Assemble Your Crew: Automatic Multi-agent Communication Topology Design via Autoregressive Graph Generationcited by 57
- 2025Voting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debatecited by 55
- 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Self-Adaptive Promptingcited by 52
- 2025Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoningcited by 27
- 2024An Electoral Approach to Diversify LLM-based Multi-Agent Collective Decision-Makingcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.