Neural posterior estimation for scalable and accurate inverse parameter inference in Li-ion batteries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Diagnosing the internal state of Li-ion batteries is critical for battery research, operation of real-world systems, and prognostic evaluation of remaining lifetime. By using physics-based models to perform probabilistic parameter estimation via Bayesian calibration, diagnostics can account for the uncertainty due to model fitness, data noise, and the observability of any given parameter. However, Bayesian calibration in Li-ion batteries using electrochemical data is computationally intensive even when using a fast surrogate in place of physics-based models, requiring many thousands of model evaluations. A fully amortized alternative is neural posterior estimation (NPE). NPE shifts the computational burden from the parameter estimation step to data generation and model training, reducing the parameter estimation time from minutes to milliseconds, enabling real-time applications. The present work shows that NPE calibrates parameters equally or more accurately than Bayesian calibration, and we demonstrate that the higher computational costs for data generation are tractable even in high-dimensional cases (ranging from 6 to 27 estimated parameters), but the NPE method can lead to higher voltage prediction errors. The NPE method also offers several interpretability advantages over Bayesian calibration, such as local parameter sensitivity to specific regions of the voltage curve. The NPE method is demonstrated using an experimental fast charge dataset, with parameter estimates validated against measurements of loss of lithium inventory and loss of active material. The implementation is made available in a companion repository (https://github.com/NatLabRockies/BatFIT).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2026.
Builds on
21 of 60 references.
References · 21
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
- 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
- 2019Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyrocited by 187
- 2023Flow Matching for Scalable Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 97
- 2019Stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlocited by 56
- 2025Simulation-Based Inference: A Practical Guidecited by 30
9 more
- 2021Neural Networks for Parameter Estimation in Intractable Modelscited by 28
- 2021Adversarial sampling of unknown and high-dimensional conditional distributionscited by 13
- 2020Bayesian Parameter Estimation Applied to the Li-ion Battery Single Particle Model with Electrolyte Dynamicscited by 6
- 2023PINN surrogate of Li-ion battery models for parameter inference. Part I: Implementation and multi-fidelity hierarchies for the single-particle modelcited by 6
- 2023PINN surrogate of Li-ion battery models for parameter inference. Part II: Regularization and application of the pseudo-2D modelcited by 5
- 2024Active Sequential Posterior Estimation for Sample-Efficient Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 5
- 2020Unlocking Extra Value from Grid Batteries Using Advanced Modelscited by 2
- 2024SUNDIALS Time Integrators for Exascale Applications with Many Independent ODE Systemscited by 1
- 2025Multidimensional Distributional Neural Network Output Demonstrated in Super-Resolution of Surface Wind Speedcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.