Towards Intrinsically Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification in Industrial Data-Driven Models via Diffusion Sampler
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
In modern process industries, data-driven models are important tools for real-time monitoring when key performance indicators are difficult to measure directly. While accurate predictions are essential, reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is equally critical for safety, reliability, and decision-making, but remains a major challenge in current data-driven approaches. In this work, we introduce a diffusion-based posterior sampling framework that inherently produces well-calibrated predictive uncertainty via faithful posterior sampling, eliminating the need for post-hoc calibration. In extensive evaluations on synthetic distributions, the Raman-based phenylacetic acid soft sensor benchmark, and a real ammonia synthesis case study, our method achieves practical improvements over existing UQ techniques in both uncertainty calibration and predictive accuracy. These results highlight diffusion samplers as a principled and scalable paradigm for advancing uncertainty-aware modeling in industrial applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2026.
Builds on
18 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2013A survey of the Schr"odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transportcited by 292
- 2020Scalable Gradients for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 271
- 2021Path Integral Sampler: a stochastic control approach for samplingcited by 181
- 2021Neural SDEs as Infinite-Dimensional GANscited by 161
- 2023Denoising Diffusion Samplerscited by 149
- 2014On the relation between optimal transport and Schr"odinger bridges: A stochastic control viewpointcited by 99
5 more
- 2019Theoretical guarantees for sampling and inference in generative models with latent diffusionscited by 97
- 2021Bayesian Learning via Neural Schr"odinger-F"ollmer Flowscited by 56
- 2021Infinitely Deep Bayesian Neural Networks with Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 38
- 2021Annealed Stein Variational Gradient Descentcited by 26
- 2025Adjoint Schr"odinger Bridge Samplercited by 21
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Uncertainty Estimation for Molecular Diffusion Models
- 2026Adaptive Diffusion Posterior Sampling for Data and Model Fusion of Complex Nonlinear Dynamical Systems
- 2026DiffusionRollout: Uncertainty-Aware Rollout Planning in Long-Horizon PDE Solving
- 2023Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation in Surrogate-based Bayesian Inference
- 2023User-defined Event Sampling and Uncertainty Quantification in Diffusion Models for Physical Dynamical Systems
- 2026Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating Posterior Fidelity of Diffusion Inverse Solvers
- 2024Zero-Shot Uncertainty Quantification using Diffusion Probabilistic Models
- 2026Parameter Inference and Uncertainty Quantification with Diffusion Models: Extending CDI to 2D Spatial Conditioning