Label Shift Estimation With Incremental Prior Update
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An assumption often made in supervised learning is that the training and testing sets have the same label distribution. However, in real-life scenarios, this assumption rarely holds. For example, medical diagnosis result distributions change over time and across locations; fraud detection models must adapt as patterns of fraudulent activity shift; the category distribution of social media posts changes based on trending topics and user demographics. In the task of label shift estimation, the goal is to estimate the changing label distribution pt(y) in the testing set, assuming the likelihood p(x|y) does not change, implying no concept drift. In this paper, we propose a new approach for post-hoc label shift estimation, unlike previous methods that perform moment matching with confusion matrix estimated from a validation set or maximize the likelihood of the new data with an expectation-maximization algorithm. We aim to incrementally update the prior on each sample, adjusting each posterior for more accurate label shift estimation. The proposed method is based on intuitive assumptions on classifiers that are generally true for modern probabilistic classifiers. The proposed method relies on a weaker notion of calibration compared to other methods. As a post-hoc approach for label shift estimation, the proposed method is versatile and can be applied to any black-box probabilistic classifier. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and MNIST show that the proposed method consistently outperforms the current state-of-the-art maximum likelihood-based methods under different calibrations and varying intensities of label shift.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2026.
Builds on
14 of 27 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
- 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 251
- 2021CReST: A Class-Rebalancing Self-Training Framework for Imbalanced Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 175
- 2020Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label Shiftcited by 125
- 2019Regularized Learning for Domain Adaptation under Label Shiftscited by 120
- 2020A Unified View of Label Shift Estimationcited by 119
- 2020Distribution Aligning Refinery of Pseudo-label for Imbalanced Semi-supervised Learningcited by 105
- 2021Classifier Calibration: A survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilitiescited by 73
Built on by
Not cited yet.