Infeasibility Aware Large Language Models for Combinatorial Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems, but most existing methods emphasize feasible-instance solution generation and do not explicitly address infeasibility detection. We propose an infeasibility-aware framework that combines certifiable dataset construction, supervised fine-tuning, and LLM-assisted downstream search. For the minor-embedding problem, we introduce a new mathematical programming formulation together with provable zero-phase infeasibility screening, which enables scalable construction of training instances labeled either as feasible with structured certificates or as certifiably infeasible. Using training data generated through this exact optimization pipeline, we show that an 8B-parameter LLM can be fine-tuned to jointly perform solution generation and infeasibility detection. We further utilize LLM outputs as warm starts for downstream local search, providing a practical way to accelerate optimization even when the LLM outputs are imperfect. Experiments show that our fine-tuned model improves overall accuracy by up to 30% over GPT-5.2; meanwhile LLM-guided warm starts provide up to 2× speedup compared with starting from scratch in downstream local search.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.
Builds on
25 of 49 references.
References · 25
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
- 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 623
- 2024ReEvo: Large Language Models as Hyper-Heuristics with Reflective Evolutioncited by 276
- 2023Large Language Models as Evolutionary Optimizerscited by 124
- 2024ORLM: A Customizable Framework in Training Large Models for Automated Optimization Modelingcited by 124
- 2023SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Promptingcited by 102
- 2024LLMOPT: Learning to Define and Solve General Optimization Problems from Scratchcited by 102
- 2025Algorithm Discovery With LLMs: Evolutionary Search Meets Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
13 more
- 2023OptiMUS: Optimization Modeling Using MIP Solvers and large language modelscited by 39
- 2024OptiMUS-0.3: Using Large Language Models to Model and Solve Optimization Problems at Scalecited by 38
- 2025SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT Formulascited by 33
- 2025Large Language Models as End-to-end Combinatorial Optimization Solverscited by 28
- 2023Diagnosing Infeasible Optimization Problems Using Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2014A practical heuristic for finding graph minorscited by 26
- 2025Large Language Models for Combinatorial Optimization: A Systematic Reviewcited by 20
- 2024Can Transformers Reason Logically? A Study in SAT Solvingcited by 16
- 2025Have Large Language Models Learned to Reason? A Characterization via 3-SAT Phase Transitioncited by 14
- 2015Fast clique minor generation in Chimera qubit connectivity graphscited by 10
- 2024DiLA: Enhancing LLM Tool Learning with Differential Logic Layercited by 6
- 2019Integer programming techniques for minor-embedding in quantum annealerscited by 5
- 2025Minor Embedding for Quantum Annealing with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.