mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

No Attacker Needed: Unintentional Cross-User Contamination in Shared-State LLM Agents

arXiv 2604.01350 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents increasingly operate across repeated sessions, maintaining task states to ensure continuity. In many deployments, a single agent serves multiple users within a team or organization, reusing a shared knowledge layer across user identities. This shared persistence expands the failure surface: information that is locally valid for one user can silently degrade another user's outcome when the agent reapplies it without regard for scope. We refer to this failure mode as unintentional cross-user contamination (UCC). Unlike adversarial memory poisoning, UCC requires no attacker; it arises from benign interactions whose scope-bound artifacts persist and are later misapplied. We formalize UCC through a controlled evaluation protocol, introduce a taxonomy of three contamination types, and evaluate the problem in two shared-state mechanisms. Under raw shared state, benign interactions alone produce contamination rates of 57--71%. A write-time sanitization is effective when shared state is conversational, but leaves substantial residual risk when shared state includes executable artifacts, with contamination often manifesting as silent wrong answers. These results indicate that shared-state agents need artifact-level defenses beyond text-level sanitization to prevent silent cross-user failures.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

30 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025MURMUR: Using cross-user chatter to break collaborative language agents in groups21 Nov
  2. 2025A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework for LLM-Based Agent Memory29 Sep
  3. 2025Memory Injection Attacks on LLM Agents via Query-Only Interaction5 Mar
  4. 2024Imprompter: Tricking LLM Agents into Improper Tool Use19 Oct
  5. 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct
  6. 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul
  7. 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents5 Mar

Other references · 23

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  4. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  6. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  7. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
  8. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
  9. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  10. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
  11. 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,063
  12. 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 634
11 more
  1. 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
  2. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 364
  3. 2024Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A Surveycited by 283
  4. 2024PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 267
  5. 2023Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 264
  6. 2024Scaling Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 241
  7. 2025Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challengescited by 205
  8. 2024BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 86
  9. 2024EHRAgent: Code Empowers Large Language Models for Few-shot Complex Tabular Reasoning on Electronic Health Recordscited by 78
  10. 2025Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Controlcited by 61
  11. 2026AgentDyn: Are Your Agent Security Defenses Deployable in Real-World Dynamic Environments?cited by 59

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Routine Chats Turn Toxic: Unintended Long-Term State Poisoning in Personalized Agents
  2. 2026Hidden in Memory: Sleeper Memory Poisoning in LLM Agents
  3. 2026Towards a Unified Misuse Monitoring Benchmark
  4. 2026Remembering More, Risking More: Longitudinal Safety Risks in Memory-Equipped LLM Agents
  5. 2026From Untrusted Input to Trusted Memory: A Systematic Study of Memory Poisoning Attacks in LLM Agents
  6. 2026State Contamination in Memory-Augmented LLM Agents
  7. 2026What If Prompt Injection Never Left? Rethinking Agent Security through Cross-Session Stored Prompt Injection
  8. 2026SafeClawBench: Separating Semantic, Audit-Evidence, and Sandbox Harm in Tool-Using LLM Agents