mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking AI Literacy Education in Higher Education: Bridging Risk Perception and Responsible Adoption

arXiv 2603.29935 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI becomes increasingly embedded across societal domains, understanding how future AI practitioners, particularly technology students, perceive its risks is essential for responsible development and adoption. This study analyzed responses from 139 students in Computer Science, Data Science/Data Analytics, and other disciplines using both explicit AI risk ratings and scenario-based assessments of risk and adoption willingness. Four key findings emerged: (1) Students expressed substantially higher concern for concrete, explicitly stated risks than for abstract or scenario-embedded risks; (2) Perceived risk and willingness to adopt AI demonstrated a clear inverse relationship; (3) Although technical education narrowed gender differences in risk awareness, male students reported higher adoption willingness; and (4) A form of "risk underappreciation" was observed, wherein students in AI-related specializations showed both elevated explicit risk awareness and higher willingness to adopt AI, despite lower recognition of risks in applied scenarios. These findings underscore the need for differentiated AI literacy strategies that bridge the gap between awareness and responsible adoption and offer valuable insights for educators, policymakers, industry leaders, and academic institutions aiming to cultivate ethically informed and socially responsible AI practitioners.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 64 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  2. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 134
  3. 2020Detecting Deep-Fake Videos from Appearance and Behaviorcited by 66
  4. 2023The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy makingcited by 20
  5. 2023Protecting Society from AI Misuse: When are Restrictions on Capabilities Warranted?cited by 15
  6. 2017What's up with Privacy?: User Preferences and Privacy Concerns in Intelligent Personal Assistantscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.