Learning to Generate Formally Verifiable Step-by-Step Logic Reasoning via Structured Formal Intermediaries
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated impressive performance on complex, multi-step reasoning tasks, especially when post-trained with outcome-rewarded reinforcement learning Guo et al. 2025. However, it has been observed that outcome rewards often overlook flawed intermediate steps, leading to unreliable reasoning steps even when final answers are correct. To address this unreliable reasoning, we propose PRoSFI (Process Reward over Structured Formal Intermediates), a novel reward method that enhances reasoning reliability without compromising accuracy. Instead of generating formal proofs directly, which is rarely accomplishable for a modest-sized (7B) model, the model outputs structured intermediate steps aligned with its natural language reasoning. Each step is then verified by a formal prover. Only fully validated reasoning chains receive high rewards. The integration of formal verification guides the model towards generating step-by-step machine-checkable proofs, thereby yielding more credible final answers. PRoSFI offers a simple and effective approach to training trustworthy reasoning models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.
Builds on
28 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild24 Mar
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
- 2025Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learning20 Feb
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul
Other references · 20
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
- 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 388
- 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 337
- 2020ProofWriter: Generating Implications, Proofs, and Abductive Statements over Natural Languagecited by 324
- 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 287
- 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logiccited by 235
- 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 217
8 more
- 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Searchcited by 197
- 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
- 2024On Memorization of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoningcited by 117
- 2025Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 101
- 2025Winning Gold at IMO 2025 with a Model-Agnostic Verification-and-Refinement Pipelinecited by 82
- 2025Solving Formal Math Problems by Decomposition and Iterative Reflectioncited by 35
- 2024LogicPro: Improving Complex Logical Reasoning via Program-Guided Learningcited by 14
- 2024Logic Agent: Enhancing Validity with Logic Rule Invocationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Correct Answers from Sound Reasoning: Verifiable Process Supervision for Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026From Outcomes to Strategies: Learning Strategy Utility for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Learning to Prove, Not Just to Answer: Reinforcement Learning from Formal Verification for Natural-Language Logical Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Learning to Prove, Not Just to Answer: Reinforcement Learning from Formal Verification for Natural-Language Logical Reasoning29 Sep 2026
- 2026From Outcomes to Strategies: Learning Strategy Utility for Mathematical Reasoning26 Sep 2026
- 2026Correct Answers from Sound Reasoning: Verifiable Process Supervision for Language Models3 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic Verification
- 2026Verify to Amplify: Improving Reasoning via Learned Chain-of-Thought Verification
- 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling
- 2026Beyond Outcome Verification: Verifiable Process Reward Models for Structured Reasoning
- 2026Rewarding Novel Deductions: Solver-guided Process Supervision for Logical Reasoning
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning
- 2026LLM Reasoning with Process Rewards for Outcome-Guided Steps
- 2026Pencil Puzzle Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Verifiable Reasoning