mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Seeing the Evidence, Missing the Answer: Tool-Guided Vision-Language Models on Visual Illusions

arXiv 2603.29428 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit a systematic bias when confronted with classic optical illusions: they overwhelmingly predict the illusion as "real" regardless of whether the image has been counterfactually modified. We present a tool-guided inference framework for the DataCV 2026 Challenge (Tasks I and II) that addresses this failure mode without any model training. An off-the-shelf vision-language model is given access to a small set of generic image manipulation tools: line drawing, region cropping, side-by-side comparison, and channel isolation, together with an illusion-type-routing system prompt that prescribes which tools to invoke for each perceptual question category. Critically, every tool call produces a new, immutable image resource appended to a persistent registry, so the model can reference and compose any prior annotated view throughout its reasoning chain. Rather than hard-coding illusion-specific modules, this generic-tool-plus-routing design yields strong cross-structural generalization: performance remained consistent from the validation set to a test set containing structurally unfamiliar illusion variants (e.g., Mach Bands rotated from vertical to horizontal stacking). We further report three empirical observations that we believe warrant additional investigation: (i) a strong positive-detection bias likely rooted in imbalanced illusion training data, (ii) a striking dissociation between pixel-accurate spatial reasoning and logical inference over self-generated annotations, and (iii) pronounced sensitivity to image compression artifacts that compounds false positives.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

9 of 11 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Seeing Is Believing? A Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models on Visual Illusions and Anomalies2 Feb
  2. 2026Do VLMs Perceive or Recall? Probing Visual Perception vs. Memory with Classic Visual Illusions29 Jan
  3. 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into words9 Jul
  4. 2024Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models13 Jun

Other references · 5

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 603
  4. 2023MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Actioncited by 517
  5. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 516

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024IllusionVQA: A Challenging Optical Illusion Dataset for Vision Language Models
  2. 2026Illusion-Aware Visual Preprocessing and Anti-Illusion Prompting for Classic Illusion Understanding in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025IllusionBench+: A Large-scale and Comprehensive Benchmark for Visual Illusion Understanding in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025SemVink: Advancing VLMs' Semantic Understanding of Optical Illusions via Visual Global Thinking
  5. 2026Beyond Shortcuts: Mitigating Visual Illusions in Frozen VLMs via Qualitative Reasoning
  6. 2026Can LVLMs Uncover the Truth Behind Visual Illusions? An Analysis of Perceptual and Reasoning Capabilities
  7. 2025Do Large Vision-Language Models Distinguish between the Actual and Apparent Features of Illusions?
  8. 2026Seeing without Looking: Do Vision-Language Benchmarks Really Test Vision?