Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Cooperative Tactical Deconfliction of Small Unmanned Aerial Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing deployment of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUASs) in low-altitude airspaces has increased the need for reliable tactical deconfliction under safety-critical constraints. Tactical deconfliction involves short-horizon decision-making in dense, partially observable, and heterogeneous multi-agent environments, where both cooperative separation assurance and operational efficiency must be maintained. While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, their direct application to air traffic control remains limited by insufficient domain grounding and unpredictable output inconsistency. This paper investigates LLMs as decision-makers in cooperative multi-agent tactical deconfliction using fine-tuning strategies that align model outputs to human operator heuristics. We propose a simulation-to-language data generation pipeline based on the BlueSky air traffic simulator that produces rule-consistent deconfliction datasets reflecting established safety practices. A pretrained Qwen-Math-7B model is fine-tuned using two parameter-efficient strategies: supervised fine-tuning with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and preference-based fine-tuning combining LoRA with Group-Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Experimental results on validation datasets and closed-loop simulations demonstrate that supervised LoRA fine-tuning substantially improves decision accuracy, consistency, and separation performance compared to the pretrained LLM, with significant reductions in near mid-air collisions. GRPO provides additional coordination benefits but exhibits reduced robustness when interacting with heterogeneous agent policies.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 33 references.
References · 14
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2025Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMscited by 158
- 2024What Did I Do Wrong? Quantifying LLMs' Sensitivity and Consistency to Prompt Engineeringcited by 88
- 2025From Language to Action: A Review of Large Language Models as Autonomous Agents and Tool Userscited by 32
- 2025The Order Effect: Investigating Prompt Sensitivity to Input Order in LLMscited by 19
- 2025Next-Generation LLM for UAV: From Natural Language to Autonomous Flightcited by 10
- 2023AviationGPT: A Large Language Model for the Aviation Domaincited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Large Language Model-Assisted UAV Operations and Communications: A Multifaceted Survey and Tutorial
- 2025UAVBench: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Autonomous and Agentic AI UAV Systems via LLM-Generated Flight Scenarios
- 2026α3-Bench: A Unified Benchmark of Safety, Robustness, and Efficiency for LLM-Based UAV Agents over 6G Networks
- 2026SAGE-LLM: Towards Safe and Generalizable LLM Controller with Fuzzy-CBF Verification and Graph-Structured Knowledge Retrieval for UAV Decision
- 2026AeroCopilotBench: A Two-Tier Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents as Aviation Copilots in an Interactive Virtual Cockpit Environment
- 2026Agentic AI Networking for Heterogeneous Unmanned Aerial Systems in Low-Altitude Wireless Networks
- 2026PilotBench: A Benchmark for General Aviation Agents with Safety Constraints
- 2023LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70B