Can Unsupervised Segmentation Reduce Annotation Costs for Video Semantic Segmentation?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Present-day deep neural networks for video semantic segmentation require a large number of fine-grained pixel-level annotations to achieve the best possible results. Obtaining such annotations, however, is very expensive. On the other hand, raw, unannotated video frames are practically free to obtain. Similarly, coarse annotations, which do not require precise boundaries, are also much cheaper. This paper investigates approaches to reduce the annotation cost required for video segmentation datasets by utilising such resources. We show that using state-of-the-art segmentation foundation models, Segment Anything Model (SAM) and Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2), we can utilise both unannotated frames as well as coarse annotations to alleviate the effort required for manual annotation of video segmentation datasets by automating mask generation. Our investigation suggests that if used appropriately, we can reduce the need for annotation by a third with similar performance for video semantic segmentation. More significantly, our analysis suggests that the variety of frames in the dataset is more important than the number of frames for obtaining the best performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 42 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,148
17 more
- 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 552
- 2022OneFormer: One Transformer to Rule Universal Image Segmentationcited by 327
- 2017Dilated Residual Networkscited by 293
- 2018Adversarial Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 173
- 2019Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with High- and Low-level Consistencycited by 147
- 2018Improving Semantic Segmentation via Video Propagation and Label Relaxationcited by 134
- 2018Accel: A Corrective Fusion Network for Efficient Semantic Segmentation on Videocited by 78
- 2020Temporally Distributed Networks for Fast Video Semantic Segmentationcited by 77
- 2016Semantic Video Segmentation by Gated Recurrent Flow Propagationcited by 76
- 2017Semantic Video CNNs through Representation Warpingcited by 65
- 2020Efficient Semantic Video Segmentation with Per-frame Inferencecited by 63
- 2018Low-Latency Video Semantic Segmentationcited by 61
- 2021SeMask: Semantically Masked Transformers for Semantic Segmentationcited by 55
- 2021Temporal Memory Attention for Video Semantic Segmentationcited by 49
- 2020Improving Semantic Segmentation via Self-Trainingcited by 30
- 2016Surveillance Video Parsing with Single Frame Supervisioncited by 13
- 2021GSVNet: Guided Spatially-Varying Convolution for Fast Semantic Segmentation on Videocited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.