Weakly Convex Ridge Regularization for 3D Non-Cartesian MRI Reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While highly accelerated non-Cartesian acquisition protocols significantly reduce scan time, they often entail long reconstruction delays. Deep learning based reconstruction methods can alleviate this, but often lack stability and robustness to distribution shifts. As an alternative, we train a rotation invariant weakly convex ridge regularizer (WCRR). The resulting variational reconstruction approach is benchmarked against state of the art methods on retrospectively simulated data and (out of distribution) on prospective GoLF SPARKLING and CAIPIRINHA acquisitions. Our approach consistently outperforms widely used baselines and achieves performance comparable to Plug and Play reconstruction with a state of the art 3D DRUNet denoiser, while offering substantially improved computational efficiency and robustness to acquisition changes. In summary, WCRR unifies the strengths of principled variational methods and modern deep learning based approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2026.
Builds on
25 of 68 references.
References · 25
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 603
- 2020Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Deep Denoiser Priorcited by 467
- 2017MoDL: Model Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problemscited by 384
- 2017Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Datacited by 340
- 2016The Little Engine that Could: Regularization by Denoising (RED)cited by 303
- 2020Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 290
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 282
- 2017Learned Primal-dual Reconstructioncited by 251
- 2021Gradient Step Denoiser for convergent Plug-and-Playcited by 107
- 2018Regularization by Denoising: Clarifications and New Interpretationscited by 102
- 2022Proximal Denoiser for Convergent Plug-and-Play Optimization with Nonconvex Regularizationcited by 79
13 more
- 2020Total Deep Variation for Linear Inverse Problemscited by 53
- 2020The troublesome kernel -- On hallucinations, no free lunches and the accuracy-stability trade-off in inverse problemscited by 40
- 2022A Neural-Network-Based Convex Regularizer for Inverse Problemscited by 40
- 2023Learning Weakly Convex Regularizers for Convergent Image-Reconstruction Algorithmscited by 30
- 2025DeepInverse: A Python package for solving imaging inverse problems with deep learningcited by 27
- 2021Recovery Analysis for Plug-and-Play Priors using the Restricted Eigenvalue Conditioncited by 22
- 2021Regularising Inverse Problems with Generative Machine Learning Modelscited by 22
- 2022Stable Deep MRI Reconstruction using Generative Priorscited by 21
- 2020Multi-Coil MRI Reconstruction Challenge -- Assessing Brain MRI Reconstruction Models and their Generalizability to Varying Coil Configurationscited by 18
- 2023Deep Equilibrium Learning of Explicit Regularizers for Imaging Inverse Problemscited by 15
- 2023Neural-network-based regularization methods for inverse problems in imagingcited by 14
- 2025Learning Regularization Functionals for Inverse Problems: A Comparative Studycited by 12
- 2024Stability of Data-Dependent Ridge-Regularization for Inverse Problemscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.