Finding Distributed Object-Centric Properties in Self-Supervised Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised Vision Transformers (ViTs) like DINO show an emergent ability to discover objects, typically observed in [CLS] token attention maps of the final layer. However, these maps often contain spurious activations resulting in poor localization of objects. This is because the [CLS] token, trained on an image-level objective, summarizes the entire image instead of focusing on objects. This aggregation dilutes the object-centric information existing in the local, patch-level interactions. We analyze this by computing inter-patch similarity using patch-level attention components (query, key, and value) across all layers. We find that: (1) Object-centric properties are encoded in the similarity maps derived from all three components (q, k, v), unlike prior work that uses only key features or the [CLS] token. (2) This object-centric information is distributed across the network, not just confined to the final layer. Based on these insights, we introduce Object-DINO, a training-free method that extracts this distributed object-centric information. Object-DINO clusters attention heads across all layers based on the similarities of their patches and automatically identifies the object-centric cluster corresponding to all objects. We demonstrate Object-DINO's effectiveness on two applications: enhancing unsupervised object discovery (+3.6 to +12.4 CorLoc gains) and mitigating object hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models by providing visual grounding. Our results demonstrate that using this distributed object-centric information improves downstream tasks without additional training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.
Builds on
31 of 35 references.
References · 31
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 898
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
19 more
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 671
- 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2024A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 352
- 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 327
- 2021Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Surveycited by 259
- 2021Localizing Objects with Self-Supervised Transformers and no Labelscited by 227
- 2023Woodpecker: Hallucination Correction for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 223
- 2019Structured Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 201
- 2024HALC: Object Hallucination Reduction via Adaptive Focal-Contrast Decodingcited by 171
- 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
- 2022TokenCut: Segmenting Objects in Images and Videos with Self-supervised Transformer and Normalized Cutcited by 111
- 2020Toward unsupervised, multi-object discovery in large-scale image collectionscited by 65
- 2024Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Image-Grounded Guidancecited by 44
- 2025Self-Correcting Decoding with Generative Feedback for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 44
- 2025Large Vision-Language Model Alignment and Misalignment: A Survey Through the Lens of Explainabilitycited by 28
- 2024RITUAL: Random Image Transformations as a Universal Anti-hallucination Lever in Large Vision Language Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Learning Object Focused Attention
- 2023Object-centric Learning with Cyclic Walks between Parts and Whole
- 2024Bootstrapping Top-down Information for Self-modulating Slot Attention
- 2025CObL: Toward Zero-Shot Ordinal Layering without User Prompting
- 2024Visual Reasoning in Object-Centric Deep Neural Networks: A Comparative Cognition Approach
- 2025LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision
- 2026Evaluating Object-Centric Models beyond Object Discovery
- 2026Learning to Generate Multiple Objects from Dense and Occluded Layouts