mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Where Do Your Citations Come From? Citation-Constellation: A Free, Open-Source, No-Code, and Auditable Tool for Citation Network Decomposition with Complementary BARON and HEROCON Scores

arXiv 2603.24216 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2026cs.DL cs.AI cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard citation metrics treat all citations as equal, obscuring the social and structural pathways through which scholarly influence propagates. I introduce Citation-Constellation, a freely available no-code tool for citation network analysis with two complementary bibliometric scores that decompose a researcher's citation profile by network proximity between citing and cited authors. BARON (Boundary-Anchored Research Outreach Network score) is a strict binary metric counting only citations from outside the detected collaborative network. HEROCON (Holistic Equilibrated Research Outreach CONstellation score) applies graduated weights assigning partial credit to in-group citations based on relationship proximity. The gap between scores serves as a diagnostic of inner-circle dependence. An extended abstract with full details appears in the paper. The tool implements this through a phased architecture: (1) self-citation analysis, (2) co-authorship graph traversal, (3) temporal institutional affiliation matching via ROR, and (4) AI-agent-driven venue governance extraction using a local LLM. Phases 1-3 are fully operational; Phase 4 is under development. Key design choices include ORCID-validated author identity resolution, an UNKNOWN classification for citations with insufficient metadata, and comprehensive audit trails documenting every classification decision. A no-code web interface enables researchers to compute scores without programming, installation, or registration. I present these scores as structural diagnostics, not quality indicators. BARON and HEROCON describe where in the social graph citations originate. They should not be used for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. HEROCON weights are experimental and require empirical calibration.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

Builds on

20 of 89 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  3. 2022OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and conceptscited by 166
  4. 2018Over-Optimization of Academic Publishing Metrics: Observing Goodhart's Law in Actioncited by 22
  5. 2019The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Sciencecited by 21
  6. 2024Using LLMs for the Extraction and Normalization of Product Attribute Valuescited by 20
  7. 2019OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarshipcited by 16
  8. 2015Incremental Knowledge Base Construction Using DeepDivecited by 14
  9. 2015A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorscited by 14
  10. 2023Construction of Knowledge Graphs: State and Challengescited by 12
  11. 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citationscited by 11
  12. 2020Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academiccited by 11
8 more
  1. 2019What Do Citation Counts Measure? An Updated Review of Studies on Citations in Scientific Documents Published between 2006 and 2018cited by 9
  2. 2014Exploiting citation networks for large-scale author name disambiguationcited by 4
  3. 2018The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientistscited by 3
  4. 2014A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicatorscited by 2
  5. 2017The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Futurecited by 1
  6. 2019Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country-level comparative analysiscited by 1
  7. 2021Measuring Research Information Citizenship Across ORCID Practicecited by 1
  8. 2025Understanding discrepancies in the coverage of OpenAlex: the case of Chinacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.