Adaptively Robust LLM Monitoring via Activation Watermarking
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
Providers monitor deployed large language models (LLMs) to detect misuse that they cannot prevent. LLM monitoring is deterministic and often openly available, so adaptive attackers with a local copy can search offline for prompts that elicit harmful behavior and evade detection. These attacks are especially concerning because providers never observe the misuse and cannot patch their defenses post-hoc. The core challenge is resisting adaptive attackers while preserving detection rates against non-adaptive ones. We propose Activation Watermarking (AWM), which randomizes monitoring through limited fine-tuning that aligns the LLM's hidden states with a secret key-derived direction whenever a response violates a policy. Detection is a similarity test on activations the provider already computes, and attackers who know everything but the key must optimize against differently keyed surrogate detectors. At a matched 1% false-positive rate, such surrogate-based attacks evade every evaluated baseline at least 79% of the time, but AWM more than halves this evasion rate. AWM also achieves the lowest evasion rate on three of four non-adaptive jailbreak families at a small drop in utility measured across seven benchmarks. Because random high-dimensional directions are near-orthogonal, assigning one watermark per policy enables attribution. Across 20 monitored policies, AWM identifies the violated policy with 80% accuracy versus a 5% chance baseline. AWM is (i) efficient, (ii) substantially more robust against adaptive attackers than related work and (iii) can attribute which policies were violated.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Optimizing Adaptive Attacks against Watermarks for Language Models3 Oct
- 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
- 2023PTW: Pivotal Tuning Watermarking for Pre-Trained Image Generators14 Apr
Other references · 15
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
- 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teamingcited by 181
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LLM Output Detectability and Task Performance Can be Jointly Optimized
- 2025RLCracker: Evaluating the Worst-Case Vulnerability of LLM Watermarks with Adaptive RL Attacks
- 2026Beyond A Fixed Seal: Adaptive Stealing Watermark in Large Language Models
- 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models
- 2026Asking Back: Interaction-Layer Antidistillation Watermarks
- 2024Learning to Watermark LLM-generated Text via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025δ-STEAL: LLM Stealing Attack with Local Differential Privacy
- 2026SkillWatermark: An Embedded Skill Watermark of Progressive Privacy Inference via Benign Prompts ↗